{"id":6944,"date":"2026-07-13T15:00:43","date_gmt":"2026-07-13T09:30:43","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lawsikho.com\/blog\/?p=6944"},"modified":"2026-07-13T16:41:43","modified_gmt":"2026-07-13T11:11:43","slug":"labour-laws-in-india","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lawsikho.com\/blog\/labour-laws-in-india\/","title":{"rendered":"Labour Laws in India 2026: New Labour Codes Guide"},"content":{"rendered":"<!--\n  Labour laws in India 2026 - VERSION-A\n  WP-paste-ready HTML. Paste directly into the WordPress block editor as\n  Custom HTML or via the Code Editor view.\n  - Slug: labour-laws-in-india\n  - Last verified: July 2026\n  - Schema (Article + FAQPage) is included at the bottom in separate wp:html blocks.\n  - VERSION-A: clean (no CTAs \/ Expert Inserts)\n\n\n<p>Last verified: July 2026<\/p>\n<p>On the morning of 21 November 2025, payroll and HR teams across India logged in to a legal ground that had shifted overnight. Four Labour Codes came into force on the same day. Twenty-nine legacy labour statutes, some older than the Republic itself, were repealed together in a single stroke. It was the largest overhaul of Indian employment law since Independence.<\/p>\n<p>For decades, the labour laws in India were a patchwork. Twenty-nine central Acts, each with its own definitions, thresholds, registers and inspectors, sat on top of hundreds of state amendments. On that November morning they became four codes. That is the headline, and it sounds tidy. The reality underneath is anything but.<\/p>\n<p>Millions of salaried employees soon noticed something odd. Monthly take-home pay dipped on the payslip even where the total cost to company had not moved a rupee. \"Is the government cutting my salary?\" started trending. It wasn't a pay cut. It was a quiet redefinition of the word \"wages\" rewiring provident fund, gratuity and the shape of every Indian salary slip.<\/p>\n<p>The scale went well beyond the salaried class. A delivery rider and an app-based cab driver became a defined legal category for the first time, with a social-security net attached to their work. Appointment letters became mandatory for every worker, including in the unorganised sector where a written contract had always been the exception. Fixed-term staff won equal pay and pro-rata gratuity, benefits they had rarely seen before.<\/p>\n<p>But \"in force\" did not mean \"fully settled.\" The Central Rules that put flesh on the codes followed only on 8 May 2026. And because labour sits on the Concurrent List of the Constitution, state rules are still rolling out unevenly across the country. The result is a strange in-between: a nation running new law at different speeds, state by state.<\/p>\n<p>That gap is where the anxiety lives, and where the opportunity lives too. The HR managers, payroll leads and compliance officers who actually understand the four codes right now are the ones their organisations are turning to. One compliance lead who mapped her company's salary structures to the 50% wage rule before the deadline turned a payroll headache into a board-level briefing, and a promotion. This guide maps all of it: the four codes, what each changed, what it means for your salary and your compliance obligations, and where to go deeper on each piece.<\/p>\n<!-- SNIPPET BAIT -->\n\n<hr>\n\n<p>The labour laws in India were consolidated into four codes that came into force on 21 November 2025: the Code on Wages, 2019, the Industrial Relations Code, 2020, the Code on Social Security, 2020, and the Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions Code, 2020. Together they replace 29 older central labour laws and reshape wages, benefits, working hours and workplace safety.<\/p>\n<p>Each of those four codes carries a stack of changes that lands differently depending on whether you draw a salary, run a payroll, drive for an app, or advise on compliance. Start with the simplest question. What are the four codes, and what does each one govern?<\/p>\n\n<hr>\n\n<nav class=\"ls-toc\" aria-label=\"Table of contents\">\n<h2>Table of Contents<\/h2>\n<ol class=\"ls-toc-list\">\n<li><a href=\"#h2-1\">What are the labour laws in India in 2026? The four new codes<\/a>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"#h3-1a\">The four codes and what each one governs<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#h3-1b\">Which 29 laws did the codes replace?<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#h2-2\">From 29 laws to four codes: why India overhauled its labour regime<\/a>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"#h3-2a\">The 2002 Commission and the road to consolidation<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#h3-2b\">Labour on the Concurrent List: why the states matter<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#h2-3\">The Code on Wages: minimum wages, the 50% rule, and bonus<\/a>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"#h3-3a\">How &#8220;wages&#8221; is now defined and the 50% rule<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#h3-3b\">Minimum wages and the National Floor Wage<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#h3-3c\">Bonus and equal remuneration under the Code<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#h2-4\">How the 50% wage rule changes your take-home pay, PF and gratuity<\/a>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"#h3-4a\">Why your payslip changed but your CTC did not<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#h3-4b\">What it means for retirement savings and gratuity<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#h2-5\">The Social Security Code: PF, ESI, gratuity and maternity benefit<\/a>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"#h3-5a\">Provident fund and ESI, in brief<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#h3-5b\">Gratuity under the Code, including fixed-term staff<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#h3-5c\">Maternity benefit under the Code<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#h2-6\">Gig and platform workers under the new labour codes<\/a>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"#h3-6a\">Who counts as a gig, platform or contract worker?<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#h3-6b\">e-Shram registration and the gig eligibility threshold<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#h3-6c\">What aggregators must contribute<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#h2-7\">The Industrial Relations Code: hiring, firing and fixed-term employment<\/a>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"#h3-7a\">Who the IR Code covers, standing orders and retrenchment<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#h3-7b\">Fixed-term employment: equal pay, notice and pro-rata gratuity<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#h2-8\">The OSH Code: working hours, overtime, appointment letters and safety<\/a>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"#h3-8a\">Working hours, overtime and the four-day week<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#h3-8b\">Mandatory appointment letters and full-and-final settlement<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#h3-8c\">Workplace safety and the Inspector-cum-Facilitator regime<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#h2-9\">New labour codes vs old labour laws: what actually changed<\/a>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"#h3-9a\">Old provision vs new code: what changed for you<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#h3-9b\">Which of the 29 old laws went where<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#h2-10\">Are the labour codes in force yet? Implementation status in 2026<\/a>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"#h3-10a\">Notified vs enforceable vs state-rule status<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#h3-10b\">Central Rules vs State Rules: who governs what<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#h2-11\">What the new labour codes mean for employees, employers and startups<\/a>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"#h3-11a\">For employees<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#h3-11b\">For employers and HR<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#h3-11c\">For startups and small establishments<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#h2-12\">Pay, benefits and social security: explore the labour law cluster<\/a>\n<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#h2-13\">Frequently asked questions<\/a>\n<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#h2-14\">References<\/a>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"#h3-14a\">Case Law<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#h3-14b\">Statutes<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/nav>\n\n<hr>\n\n<a id=\"h2-1\"><\/a><\/p>\n<h2>What are the labour laws in India in 2026? The four new codes<\/h2>\n<p>For a century the labour laws in India grew one Act at a time, each answering the crisis in front of it. The problem wasn&#8217;t that the law was weak. It was that a single factory could fall under a dozen statutes at once, each with a different definition of &#8220;wages&#8221; and &#8220;worker.&#8221; In 2026, that fragmentation is gone at the central level, replaced by four consolidated codes.<\/p>\n<!-- INFOGRAPHIC 3: four-labour-codes-2026.html: \"The four Labour Codes at a glance\" (four-card panel, from Table 1) -->\n\n<p>Here are the four Labour Codes at a glance:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><strong>The Code on Wages, 2019<\/strong> governs minimum wages, the timing and mode of wage payment, bonus and equal remuneration. It applies across every sector and every wage bracket.<\/li>\n<li><strong>The Industrial Relations Code, 2020<\/strong> governs trade unions, standing orders, retrenchment, lay-offs, closures and dispute resolution.<\/li>\n<li><strong>The Code on Social Security, 2020<\/strong> governs provident fund, employees&#8217; state insurance, gratuity, maternity benefit and, for the first time, gig and platform workers.<\/li>\n<li><strong>The Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions Code, 2020<\/strong> governs working hours, overtime, leave, workplace safety, welfare and appointment letters.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>Each of these links to its text on the India Code portal for the reader who wants the primary source: the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.indiacode.nic.in\/handle\/123456789\/15793\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Code on Wages, 2019<\/a>, the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.indiacode.nic.in\/handle\/123456789\/22040\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Industrial Relations Code, 2020<\/a>, the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.indiacode.nic.in\/handle\/123456789\/16823\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Code on Social Security, 2020<\/a> and the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.indiacode.nic.in\/handle\/123456789\/22041\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions Code, 2020<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>So how many labour laws does India have now? The cleanest answer is &#8220;four consolidated codes at the central level, plus the state rules that operationalise them.&#8221; That phrasing matters, because the old count of 29 central Acts is exactly what the codes replaced. If someone tells you India still has dozens of separate central labour statutes, they&#8217;re describing the world before 21 November 2025.<\/p>\n<p>Think of it this way. The codes didn&#8217;t invent most of these rights from scratch. They gathered rights that were scattered across the Minimum Wages Act, the Factories Act, the EPF Act and two dozen others, and put them under four roofs with shared definitions. That shared vocabulary is the quiet revolution here, and it&#8217;s why one change to the definition of &#8220;wages&#8221; ripples through PF, gratuity and bonus all at once.<\/p>\n<p>In practice, the biggest source of confusion we see is people treating the four codes as four separate reforms. They&#8217;re not. They&#8217;re one architecture. A payroll decision under the Code on Wages immediately triggers consequences under the Social Security Code, because both now read from the same definition of remuneration.<\/p>\n<a id=\"h3-1a\"><\/a>\n<h3>The four codes and what each one governs<\/h3>\n<p>The table below is the map for the rest of this guide. Each code section further down expands one row of it.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Table 1: The four Labour Codes at a glance<\/strong><\/p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Code<\/th>\n<th>Key old laws subsumed<\/th>\n<th>What it governs<\/th>\n<th>Headline 2026 change<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Code on Wages, 2019<\/td>\n<td>Minimum Wages Act 1948, Payment of Wages Act 1936, Payment of Bonus Act 1965, Equal Remuneration Act 1976<\/td>\n<td>Minimum wages, wage payment, bonus, equal pay<\/td>\n<td>50% wage-definition rule; National Floor Wage<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Industrial Relations Code, 2020<\/td>\n<td>Industrial Disputes Act 1947, Trade Unions Act 1926, Standing Orders Act 1946<\/td>\n<td>Unions, standing orders, retrenchment, disputes<\/td>\n<td>Higher standing-orders and retrenchment threshold; fixed-term employment formalised<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Code on Social Security, 2020<\/td>\n<td>EPF Act 1952, ESI Act 1948, Payment of Gratuity Act 1972, Maternity Benefit Act 1961<\/td>\n<td>PF, ESI, gratuity, maternity, gig and platform schemes<\/td>\n<td>Gig and platform workers recognised; one-year gratuity for fixed-term staff<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>OSH Code, 2020<\/td>\n<td>Factories Act 1948, Contract Labour Act 1970, Inter-State Migrant Workmen Act 1979, and others<\/td>\n<td>Working hours, safety, welfare, appointment letters<\/td>\n<td>Universal appointment letters; faster full-and-final settlement; Inspector-cum-Facilitator<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>A quick reading tip. When a competitor blog says &#8220;the new labour code&#8221; in the singular, treat it as a red flag. There&#8217;s no single new labour code. There are four, and the differences between them are exactly where compliance mistakes happen.<\/p>\n<a id=\"h3-1b\"><\/a>\n<h3>Which 29 laws did the codes replace?<\/h3>\n<p>The short version: the four codes subsumed 29 central labour Acts, spanning wages, industrial disputes, social security and workplace safety. Some dated back to the colonial period, like the Trade Unions Act of 1926 and the Payment of Wages Act of 1936. Others were early-Republic statutes, like the Factories Act and the ESI Act of 1948.<\/p>\n<p>We&#8217;ve mapped the full 29-to-four grouping in Table 3 further down, under the comparison section, so you can see exactly which old Act now lives under which code. For now, the point to hold onto is that repeal was simultaneous. There was no staggered sunset where the old Factories Act lingered for a year. On 21 November 2025 the old statutes went, and the codes took their place.<\/p>\n<p>\n\n<figure class=\"ls-infographic-wrap\" style=\"margin:2rem 0;\">\n<div class=\"ls-ig-fourcodes\" style=\"margin:2rem 0;max-width:800px;\">\n<style>\n.ls-ig-fourcodes, .ls-ig-fourcodes *, .ls-ig-fourcodes *::before, .ls-ig-fourcodes *::after { box-sizing: border-box; }\n.ls-ig-fourcodes { font-family: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, 'Segoe UI', Roboto, sans-serif; color: #212121; }\n.ls-ig-fourcodes .infographic { max-width: 800px; margin: 0 auto; border: 1px solid #e0e0e0; border-radius: 8px; overflow: hidden; background:#ffffff; }\n.ls-ig-fourcodes .title-bar { background: #1a237e; color: #ffffff; padding: 20px 24px; text-align: center; }\n.ls-ig-fourcodes .title-bar h2 { font-size: 20px; font-weight: 700; margin:0; }\n.ls-ig-fourcodes .title-bar .subtitle { font-size: 14px; font-weight: 400; margin-top: 6px; opacity: 0.9; }\n.ls-ig-fourcodes .content { padding: 20px; display: grid; grid-template-columns: repeat(2, 1fr); gap: 16px; }\n.ls-ig-fourcodes .code-card { border: 1px solid #e0e0e0; border-radius: 8px; overflow: hidden; display: flex; flex-direction: column; border-top: 4px solid #1a237e; }\n.ls-ig-fourcodes .code-name { background: #f5f5f5; color: #1a237e; font-size: 15px; font-weight: 700; padding: 12px 14px; line-height: 1.3; }\n.ls-ig-fourcodes .code-body { padding: 12px 14px; display: flex; flex-direction: column; gap: 10px; flex: 1; }\n.ls-ig-fourcodes .block .label { display: block; font-size: 11px; font-weight: 700; text-transform: uppercase; letter-spacing: 0.4px; margin-bottom: 3px; }\n.ls-ig-fourcodes .governs .label { color: #757575; }\n.ls-ig-fourcodes .change .label { color: #ff6f00; }\n.ls-ig-fourcodes .block .val { font-size: 13px; line-height: 1.45; }\n.ls-ig-fourcodes .change { background: #fff3e0; border-radius: 6px; padding: 9px 10px; margin-top: auto; }\n.ls-ig-fourcodes .change .val { font-weight: 600; }\n.ls-ig-fourcodes .branding { text-align: right; padding: 12px 24px; font-size: 12px; color: #9e9e9e; border-top: 1px solid #e0e0e0; }\n.ls-ig-fourcodes .source { font-size: 12px; color: #757575; padding: 4px 24px 0; }\n@media (max-width: 600px) {\n  .ls-ig-fourcodes .content { grid-template-columns: 1fr; padding: 16px; }\n  .ls-ig-fourcodes .title-bar h2 { font-size: 17px; }\n  .ls-ig-fourcodes .title-bar { padding: 16px; }\n}\n<\/style>\n  <div class=\"infographic\" role=\"img\" aria-label=\"The four new labour codes in India 2026 and what each governs\">\n    <div class=\"title-bar\">\n      <h2>The four Labour Codes at a glance<\/h2>\n      <div class=\"subtitle\">What each code governs and its headline 2026 change<\/div>\n    <\/div>\n    <div class=\"content\">\n      <div class=\"code-card\">\n        <div class=\"code-name\">Code on Wages, 2019<\/div>\n        <div class=\"code-body\">\n          <div class=\"block governs\"><span class=\"label\">Governs<\/span><span class=\"val\">Minimum wages, wage payment, bonus, equal pay<\/span><\/div>\n          <div class=\"block change\"><span class=\"label\">Headline 2026 change<\/span><span class=\"val\">50% wage-definition rule; National Floor Wage<\/span><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n      <\/div>\n      <div class=\"code-card\">\n        <div class=\"code-name\">Industrial Relations Code, 2020<\/div>\n        <div class=\"code-body\">\n          <div class=\"block governs\"><span class=\"label\">Governs<\/span><span class=\"val\">Unions, standing orders, retrenchment, disputes<\/span><\/div>\n          <div class=\"block change\"><span class=\"label\">Headline 2026 change<\/span><span class=\"val\">Fixed-term employment formalised; higher standing-orders and retrenchment threshold<\/span><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n      <\/div>\n      <div class=\"code-card\">\n        <div class=\"code-name\">Code on Social Security, 2020<\/div>\n        <div class=\"code-body\">\n          <div class=\"block governs\"><span class=\"label\">Governs<\/span><span class=\"val\">PF, ESI, gratuity, maternity, gig and platform schemes<\/span><\/div>\n          <div class=\"block change\"><span class=\"label\">Headline 2026 change<\/span><span class=\"val\">Gig and platform workers recognised; one-year gratuity for fixed-term staff<\/span><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n      <\/div>\n      <div class=\"code-card\">\n        <div class=\"code-name\">OSH Code, 2020<\/div>\n        <div class=\"code-body\">\n          <div class=\"block governs\"><span class=\"label\">Governs<\/span><span class=\"val\">Working hours, safety, welfare, appointment letters<\/span><\/div>\n          <div class=\"block change\"><span class=\"label\">Headline 2026 change<\/span><span class=\"val\">Universal appointment letters; faster full-and-final settlement; Inspector-cum-Facilitator<\/span><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n      <\/div>\n    <\/div>\n    <div class=\"source\">Built from the draft&#8217;s four-codes map (Table 1). All four codes in force from 21 November 2025.<\/div>\n    <div class=\"branding\">LawSikho<\/div>\n  <\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/figure>\n\n<a id=\"h2-2\"><\/a><\/p>\n<h2>From 29 laws to four codes: why India overhauled its labour regime<\/h2>\n<p>Why tear up a legal framework that millions of employers had spent decades learning to live with? Because the framework had stopped serving anyone well. Employers drowned in overlapping registers and returns. Workers found their rights buried across statutes that contradicted one another. And the informal economy, where most Indians actually work, sat almost entirely outside the net.<\/p>\n<!-- INFOGRAPHIC 1: labour-codes-timeline.html: \"From 29 laws to four codes\" horizontal timeline, 1948 to 2026 -->\n\n<p>The road here was long. The colonial and early-Republic era left a fragmented regime: the Factories Act, the Minimum Wages Act, the Industrial Disputes Act, the EPF and ESI Acts, each solving a narrow problem.<\/p>\n<p>In 2002, the Second National Commission on Labour recommended folding this sprawl into a handful of broad codes. The Code on Wages was enacted in 2019. The other three followed in 2020. Then came the long wait for commencement, which finally arrived on 21 November 2025, with the draft Central Rules published on 30 December 2025 and the final Central Rules notified on 8 May 2026.<\/p>\n<p>There&#8217;s a deeper &#8220;why&#8221; worth naming, because it explains why labour law in India is protective by design rather than purely commercial. The Supreme Court has long read the Constitution to place a floor under labour. It held in <a href=\"https:\/\/indiankanoon.org\/doc\/496663\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">People&#8217;s Union for Democratic Rights v. Union of India, (1982) 3 SCC 235<\/a> that non-payment of minimum wages amounts to &#8220;forced labour&#8221; prohibited by Article 23.<\/p>\n<p>And in <a href=\"https:\/\/indiankanoon.org\/doc\/595099\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Bandhua Mukti Morcha v. Union of India, (1984) 3 SCC 161<\/a>, the Court read the right to live with dignity under Article 21 to include protection against exploitative labour. Consolidation didn&#8217;t dilute that constitutional floor. It carried it forward into a cleaner structure.<\/p>\n<p>Here&#8217;s the thing most explainers skip. Simplification was never the only goal. The codes also expanded coverage, pulling gig workers and the unorganised sector toward a social-security net for the first time. So this is both a tidying-up and a widening, at once. That dual character is why the reform is genuinely contested rather than universally welcomed.<\/p>\n<p>A common question practitioners raise is whether consolidation actually reduced the compliance burden or just reshuffled it. The honest answer, based on what we&#8217;ve seen so far, is that it reduced the number of statutes but not yet the number of decisions. Fewer Acts, but each decision now carries more weight because it feeds multiple downstream obligations.<\/p>\n<a id=\"h3-2a\"><\/a>\n<h3>The 2002 Commission and the road to consolidation<\/h3>\n<p>The Second National Commission on Labour, which reported in 2002, is the intellectual origin of the codes. Its core recommendation was to group India&#8217;s labour statutes into four or five functional codes: one for wages, one for industrial relations, one for social security, one for safety and working conditions. That is almost exactly the structure India adopted, roughly two decades later.<\/p>\n<p>The lag between recommendation and enactment tells you something about how sensitive labour reform is in India. Every change touches wages, job security and union power at once. That&#8217;s why the codes took years to move from a commission report to enacted law, and more years again from enactment to commencement.<\/p>\n<a id=\"h3-2b\"><\/a>\n<h3>Labour on the Concurrent List: why the states matter<\/h3>\n<p>Here&#8217;s a constitutional detail that decides how the codes actually work in your state. Labour is on the Concurrent List of the Constitution, which means both Parliament and the state legislatures can make law on it. The four codes are central law. But the rules that make them operational, the numbers and forms and registers, come partly from the states.<\/p>\n<p>That single fact explains why the codes can be &#8220;in force&#8221; nationally while their day-to-day effect varies from Gujarat to West Bengal. We come back to this in detail in the implementation-status section, because it&#8217;s the question readers get most wrong. For now, hold this: central commencement and state readiness are two different clocks.<\/p>\n\n<p>\n\n<figure class=\"ls-infographic-wrap\" style=\"margin:2rem 0;\">\n<div class=\"ls-ig-timeline\" style=\"margin:2rem 0;max-width:800px;\">\n<style>\n.ls-ig-timeline, .ls-ig-timeline *, .ls-ig-timeline *::before, .ls-ig-timeline *::after { box-sizing: border-box; }\n.ls-ig-timeline { font-family: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, 'Segoe UI', Roboto, sans-serif; color: #212121; }\n.ls-ig-timeline .infographic { max-width: 800px; margin: 0 auto; border: 1px solid #e0e0e0; border-radius: 8px; overflow: hidden; background:#ffffff; }\n.ls-ig-timeline .title-bar { background: #1a237e; color: #ffffff; padding: 20px 24px; text-align: center; }\n.ls-ig-timeline .title-bar h2 { font-size: 20px; font-weight: 700; margin:0; }\n.ls-ig-timeline .title-bar .subtitle { font-size: 14px; font-weight: 400; margin-top: 6px; opacity: 0.9; }\n.ls-ig-timeline .content { padding: 24px; }\n.ls-ig-timeline .timeline { position: relative; padding-left: 34px; }\n.ls-ig-timeline .timeline::before { content: \"\"; position: absolute; left: 11px; top: 6px; bottom: 6px; width: 3px; background: #c5cae9; border-radius: 2px; }\n.ls-ig-timeline .node { position: relative; padding-bottom: 22px; }\n.ls-ig-timeline .node:last-child { padding-bottom: 0; }\n.ls-ig-timeline .dot { position: absolute; left: -34px; top: 2px; width: 24px; height: 24px; border-radius: 50%; background: #ff6f00; border: 3px solid #ffffff; box-shadow: 0 0 0 2px #ff6f00; z-index: 2; }\n.ls-ig-timeline .node .date { font-size: 13px; font-weight: 700; color: #1a237e; letter-spacing: 0.2px; }\n.ls-ig-timeline .node .event { font-size: 14px; line-height: 1.5; margin-top: 3px; color: #212121; }\n.ls-ig-timeline .node.highlight .dot { background: #1a237e; box-shadow: 0 0 0 3px #ff6f00; width: 28px; height: 28px; left: -36px; }\n.ls-ig-timeline .node.highlight { background: #fff3e0; border-left: 4px solid #ff6f00; border-radius: 0 6px 6px 0; padding: 10px 14px 12px 14px; margin: 4px 0 22px -14px; }\n.ls-ig-timeline .node.highlight .date { font-size: 15px; }\n.ls-ig-timeline .node.highlight .event { font-weight: 600; }\n.ls-ig-timeline .callout { margin-top: 20px; background: #f5f5f5; border-left: 4px solid #1a237e; padding: 14px 16px; font-size: 14px; line-height: 1.5; border-radius: 0 6px 6px 0; }\n.ls-ig-timeline .callout strong { color: #1a237e; }\n.ls-ig-timeline .branding { text-align: right; padding: 12px 24px; font-size: 12px; color: #9e9e9e; border-top: 1px solid #e0e0e0; }\n.ls-ig-timeline .source { font-size: 12px; color: #757575; padding: 0 24px 4px; }\n@media (max-width: 600px) {\n  .ls-ig-timeline .title-bar h2 { font-size: 17px; }\n  .ls-ig-timeline .title-bar { padding: 16px; }\n  .ls-ig-timeline .content { padding: 18px 16px; }\n}\n<\/style>\n  <div class=\"infographic\" role=\"img\" aria-label=\"Timeline of labour laws in India from 29 Acts to four codes, 1948 to 2026\">\n    <div class=\"title-bar\">\n      <h2>From 29 laws to four codes<\/h2>\n      <div class=\"subtitle\">How India&#8217;s labour regime was consolidated, 1948 to 2026<\/div>\n    <\/div>\n    <div class=\"content\">\n      <div class=\"timeline\">\n        <div class=\"node\">\n          <span class=\"dot\"><\/span>\n          <div class=\"date\">1948 onward<\/div>\n          <div class=\"event\">Fragmented regime: Factories Act, Minimum Wages Act, Industrial Disputes Act, EPF and ESI Acts and more (29 central Acts).<\/div>\n        <\/div>\n        <div class=\"node\">\n          <span class=\"dot\"><\/span>\n          <div class=\"date\">2002<\/div>\n          <div class=\"event\">Second National Commission on Labour recommends consolidation into four to five codes.<\/div>\n        <\/div>\n        <div class=\"node\">\n          <span class=\"dot\"><\/span>\n          <div class=\"date\">2019<\/div>\n          <div class=\"event\">Code on Wages, 2019 enacted (first code).<\/div>\n        <\/div>\n        <div class=\"node\">\n          <span class=\"dot\"><\/span>\n          <div class=\"date\">2020<\/div>\n          <div class=\"event\">Industrial Relations, Social Security and OSH Codes passed.<\/div>\n        <\/div>\n        <div class=\"node highlight\">\n          <span class=\"dot\"><\/span>\n          <div class=\"date\">21 Nov 2025: the switchover<\/div>\n          <div class=\"event\">All four codes in force; 29 legacy laws repealed on the same day.<\/div>\n        <\/div>\n        <div class=\"node\">\n          <span class=\"dot\"><\/span>\n          <div class=\"date\">30 Dec 2025<\/div>\n          <div class=\"event\">Draft Central Rules published.<\/div>\n        <\/div>\n        <div class=\"node\">\n          <span class=\"dot\"><\/span>\n          <div class=\"date\">8 May 2026<\/div>\n          <div class=\"event\">Final Central Rules notified.<\/div>\n        <\/div>\n        <div class=\"node\">\n          <span class=\"dot\"><\/span>\n          <div class=\"date\">2026 to 2027<\/div>\n          <div class=\"event\">State rules converge; phased full enforceability (projected).<\/div>\n        <\/div>\n      <\/div>\n      <div class=\"callout\">\n        <strong>Note:<\/strong> In force since 21 November 2025 is not the same as uniformly enforceable in every state.\n      <\/div>\n    <\/div>\n    <div class=\"source\">In-force date 21 Nov 2025 and Central Rules 8 May 2026 per notified rules and reporting; state-rule convergence is projected.<\/div>\n    <div class=\"branding\">LawSikho<\/div>\n  <\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/figure>\n\n<a id=\"h2-3\"><\/a><\/p>\n<h2>The Code on Wages: minimum wages, the 50% rule, and bonus<\/h2>\n<p>If you read only one code section, make it this one. The Code on Wages, 2019 is the one that changed your payslip, and it&#8217;s the one that quietly rewired PF and gratuity for the whole salaried workforce. It subsumes four old Acts: the Minimum Wages Act, the Payment of Wages Act, the Payment of Bonus Act and the Equal Remuneration Act.<\/p>\n<p>Why does a wage definition matter so much? Because in Indian payroll, &#8220;wages&#8221; is the base that other numbers are calculated on. Move the base, and you move PF contributions, gratuity accruals and bonus eligibility all at once. That&#8217;s exactly what the Code did, and it&#8217;s why a rule that sounds technical showed up on ordinary payslips within weeks.<\/p>\n<a id=\"h3-3a\"><\/a>\n<h3>How &#8220;wages&#8221; is now defined and the 50% rule<\/h3>\n<p>The 50% wage rule is the heart of it. Under the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.indiacode.nic.in\/handle\/123456789\/15793\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Code on Wages, 2019<\/a>, &#8220;wages&#8221; is defined as basic pay plus dearness allowance (and retaining allowance where it applies), and the excluded allowances (house rent allowance, conveyance, and similar) cannot exceed 50% of total remuneration. If they do, the excess is added back into &#8220;wages&#8221; for the purpose of statutory calculations.<\/p>\n<p>Put simply: your basic-plus-DA has to be at least half of your total pay. Employers who had loaded salaries with allowances to keep the wage base low, and PF contributions lower, can&#8217;t do that anymore. The excess allowance gets pulled back into the wage base.<\/p>\n<p>Here&#8217;s what the 50% wage rule actually is, in one paragraph you can quote. The 50% wage rule requires that basic pay and dearness allowance together make up at least half of an employee&#8217;s total remuneration. Allowances beyond that 50% ceiling are added back to the wage base used to calculate provident fund, gratuity and other statutory benefits. It standardises how salary is structured across India.<\/p>\n<p>Now, here&#8217;s where it gets interesting, and where every payroll blog stops short. The 50% rule didn&#8217;t come from nowhere. It codifies a principle the Supreme Court had already laid down. In <a href=\"https:\/\/indiankanoon.org\/doc\/126246109\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Regional Provident Fund Commissioner (II), West Bengal v. Vivekananda Vidyamandir &amp; Ors., AIR 2019 SC 1240<\/a>, the Court applied the &#8220;universality test&#8221;: allowances that are paid universally, uniformly, ordinarily and necessarily to all employees form part of basic wages for provident fund purposes.<\/p>\n<p>Companion rulings in the same 2019 batch, including the Surya Roshni matter, reinforced it. The Code took that judicial test and turned it into a bright-line statutory rule. If you understand the case, the rule stops looking arbitrary and starts looking inevitable.<\/p>\n<p>A frequent mistake we see in payroll audits is treating the 50% test as a one-time structuring exercise at hiring. It isn&#8217;t. Every increment, every allowance revision, every restructure has to keep basic-plus-DA above the line. Miss that on a mid-year hike and you can quietly slip out of compliance without anyone noticing until an inspection.<\/p>\n<a id=\"h3-3b\"><\/a>\n<h3>Minimum wages and the National Floor Wage<\/h3>\n<p>The Code on Wages made the minimum wage universal. Before, minimum-wage protection depended on whether your job fell within a &#8220;scheduled employment&#8221; that a government had notified. Now a statutory minimum wage applies across sectors, to organised and unorganised work alike.<\/p>\n<p>Above the state minimum sits a new concept: the National Floor Wage. It&#8217;s a nationally set floor below which no state minimum wage may fall. States can, and do, set their own minimum wages higher. But they can&#8217;t go below the national floor. This is the constitutional idea from the People&#8217;s Union for Democratic Rights (Asiad Workers) ruling made concrete: a wage floor is protection against forced labour under Article 23, not a matter of employer discretion.<\/p>\n<p>The interaction between the floor and state minimum wages is where the detail lives, and it deserves its own treatment. For the full picture of <a href=\"\/blog\/minimum-wages-national-floor-wage-india\/\">how the National Floor Wage and state minimum wages interact<\/a>, including why the numbers vary from state to state, the dedicated spoke carries the wage schedules a hub deliberately leaves out.<\/p>\n<a id=\"h3-3c\"><\/a>\n<h3>Bonus and equal remuneration under the Code<\/h3>\n<p>The Code on Wages also absorbed the Payment of Bonus Act and the Equal Remuneration Act. Statutory bonus survives, tied to eligibility conditions and a wage ceiling. Under the earlier Payment of Bonus Act, that eligibility wage ceiling was 21,000 rupees a month. The Code on Wages does not fix that figure in the statute itself; it leaves the ceiling to be prescribed by the appropriate government by notification, so confirm the current notified figure before relying on it.<\/p>\n<p>The equal-pay principle in the Code has deep constitutional roots. The Supreme Court established in <a href=\"https:\/\/indiankanoon.org\/doc\/1230349\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Randhir Singh v. Union of India, (1982) 1 SCC 618<\/a> that &#8220;equal pay for equal work&#8221; is a constitutional principle flowing from Articles 14, 16 and 39(d). The Code on Wages carries that forward as a statutory bar on gender-based pay discrimination for the same or similar work. It&#8217;s the same principle that now underpins fixed-term parity, which we&#8217;ll come to.<\/p>\n<p>How statutory bonus is actually calculated and who qualifies runs on the eligibility conditions and the notified wage ceiling. That sits in <a href=\"\/blog\/payment-of-bonus-india\/\">bonus eligibility and calculation under the Code<\/a>, detail deliberately out of scope for this overview.<\/p>\n<a id=\"h2-4\"><\/a>\n<h2>How the 50% wage rule changes your take-home pay, PF and gratuity<\/h2>\n<p>This is the section people actually came for. The moment the 50% wage rule took effect, take-home pay dipped for a large slice of the salaried workforce, and the internet decided the government was cutting salaries. It wasn&#8217;t. But something real did change, and it&#8217;s worth understanding exactly what.<\/p>\n<!-- INFOGRAPHIC 4: fifty-percent-wage-rule-flow.html: decision\/flow strip: wage base up \u2192 PF\/gratuity up \u2192 take-home dips, CTC same -->\n\n<a id=\"h3-4a\"><\/a>\n<h3>Why your payslip changed but your CTC did not<\/h3>\n<p>The mechanics are straightforward once you see them. Raising the wage base (because basic-plus-DA must now be at least 50%) lifts the amount on which provident fund and gratuity are calculated. Higher PF means more money moves from your monthly pay into your retirement account. Your total cost to company can stay identical while your in-hand pay falls, because a larger share now gets diverted into savings you can&#8217;t spend this month.<\/p>\n<p>So is the government cutting your salary? No. Your CTC is the same. What changed is the split between what lands in your bank this month and what accumulates for later. For a lot of people that&#8217;s a genuine improvement in forced savings, even if it stings on the payslip.<\/p>\n<p>How much does take-home actually fall? Reported estimates from outlets like Business Standard and Business Today suggest a dip in the range of roughly 5 to 10% for employees in the 8 to 15 lakh rupee CTC band, with the effect larger for salaries that were heavily allowance-loaded. Treat those figures as journalistic estimates, not statutory certainties. The actual number depends entirely on how your existing salary was structured before the change.<\/p>\n<p>The mechanics flow through your provident fund account by way of your PF contribution and your UAN. Exactly <a href=\"\/blog\/epf-provident-fund-india\/\">how your PF contribution and UAN are affected<\/a>, plus the contribution math and withdrawal rules, is detail we deliberately keep out of this hub.<\/p>\n<a id=\"h3-4b\"><\/a>\n<h3>What it means for retirement savings and gratuity<\/h3>\n<p>The same higher wage base that trims your take-home also grows your retirement corpus and your gratuity entitlement. Gratuity is calculated on a formula tied to your last-drawn wages, so a bigger wage base means a bigger gratuity payout when you eventually qualify. For long-tenure employees, that&#8217;s a meaningful uplift.<\/p>\n<p>There&#8217;s a second gratuity change worth flagging here, though its full mechanics belong in the next section. Fixed-term employees now become eligible for gratuity after just one year, rather than the usual five. If your work is structured as a series of fixed-term contracts, this is a real shift in your favour. The actual calculation runs on the 15\/26 gratuity formula and the qualifying-service rules, which the Social Security section below sets out.<\/p>\n<p>Now the second-order effect that most people miss. Because salary structuring under the 50% rule is no longer a one-time setup, it&#8217;s become a recurring compliance exercise every appraisal cycle. That has quietly created a standing profession: HR and legal professionals who can model CTC, PF and gratuity impact on demand. Companies that used to outsource this once a year now need it continuously. Demand for people who can actually do this modelling has jumped, and it&#8217;s not going back down.<\/p>\n\n<p>\n\n<figure class=\"ls-infographic-wrap\" style=\"margin:2rem 0;\">\n<div class=\"ls-ig-wageflow\" style=\"margin:2rem 0;max-width:800px;\">\n<style>\n.ls-ig-wageflow, .ls-ig-wageflow *, .ls-ig-wageflow *::before, .ls-ig-wageflow *::after { box-sizing: border-box; }\n.ls-ig-wageflow { font-family: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, 'Segoe UI', Roboto, sans-serif; color: #212121; }\n.ls-ig-wageflow .infographic { max-width: 800px; margin: 0 auto; border: 1px solid #e0e0e0; border-radius: 8px; overflow: hidden; background:#ffffff; }\n.ls-ig-wageflow .title-bar { background: #1a237e; color: #ffffff; padding: 20px 24px; text-align: center; }\n.ls-ig-wageflow .title-bar h2 { font-size: 20px; font-weight: 700; margin:0; }\n.ls-ig-wageflow .title-bar .subtitle { font-size: 14px; font-weight: 400; margin-top: 6px; opacity: 0.9; }\n.ls-ig-wageflow .content { padding: 24px; }\n.ls-ig-wageflow .flow { display: flex; flex-direction: column; gap: 0; }\n.ls-ig-wageflow .step { display: flex; align-items: stretch; gap: 14px; }\n.ls-ig-wageflow .step-num { flex: 0 0 40px; height: 40px; width: 40px; border-radius: 50%; background: #ff6f00; color: #ffffff; font-size: 18px; font-weight: 700; display: flex; align-items: center; justify-content: center; }\n.ls-ig-wageflow .step-body { flex: 1; border: 1px solid #e0e0e0; border-radius: 8px; padding: 12px 16px; background: #ffffff; }\n.ls-ig-wageflow .step-title { font-size: 15px; font-weight: 700; color: #1a237e; line-height: 1.35; }\n.ls-ig-wageflow .step-note { font-size: 13px; color: #616161; line-height: 1.45; margin-top: 3px; }\n.ls-ig-wageflow .connector { flex: 0 0 40px; display: flex; justify-content: center; align-items: center; height: 22px; }\n.ls-ig-wageflow .connector .arrow { color: #ff6f00; font-size: 20px; font-weight: 700; line-height: 1; }\n.ls-ig-wageflow .callout { margin-top: 20px; background: #fff3e0; border-left: 4px solid #ff6f00; padding: 14px 16px; font-size: 14px; line-height: 1.5; border-radius: 0 6px 6px 0; }\n.ls-ig-wageflow .callout strong { color: #1a237e; }\n.ls-ig-wageflow .branding { text-align: right; padding: 12px 24px; font-size: 12px; color: #9e9e9e; border-top: 1px solid #e0e0e0; }\n.ls-ig-wageflow .source { font-size: 12px; color: #757575; padding: 0 24px 4px; }\n@media (max-width: 600px) {\n  .ls-ig-wageflow .title-bar h2 { font-size: 17px; }\n  .ls-ig-wageflow .title-bar { padding: 16px; }\n  .ls-ig-wageflow .content { padding: 18px 16px; }\n}\n<\/style>\n  <div class=\"infographic\" role=\"img\" aria-label=\"How the 50% wage rule affects take-home pay, PF and gratuity\">\n    <div class=\"title-bar\">\n      <h2>Does the 50% wage rule change your take-home?<\/h2>\n      <div class=\"subtitle\">The direction of the change, step by step<\/div>\n    <\/div>\n    <div class=\"content\">\n      <div class=\"flow\">\n        <div class=\"step\">\n          <div class=\"step-num\">1<\/div>\n          <div class=\"step-body\">\n            <div class=\"step-title\">Basic + DA raised to at least 50% of pay<\/div>\n            <div class=\"step-note\">Wage definition under the Code on Wages<\/div>\n          <\/div>\n        <\/div>\n        <div class=\"connector\"><span class=\"arrow\">&darr;<\/span><\/div>\n        <div class=\"step\">\n          <div class=\"step-num\">2<\/div>\n          <div class=\"step-body\">\n            <div class=\"step-title\">Wage base goes up<\/div>\n            <div class=\"step-note\">The figure PF and gratuity are calculated on<\/div>\n          <\/div>\n        <\/div>\n        <div class=\"connector\"><span class=\"arrow\">&darr;<\/span><\/div>\n        <div class=\"step\">\n          <div class=\"step-num\">3<\/div>\n          <div class=\"step-body\">\n            <div class=\"step-title\">PF and gratuity contributions go up<\/div>\n            <div class=\"step-note\">More moves into long-term savings<\/div>\n          <\/div>\n        <\/div>\n        <div class=\"connector\"><span class=\"arrow\">&darr;<\/span><\/div>\n        <div class=\"step\">\n          <div class=\"step-num\">4<\/div>\n          <div class=\"step-body\">\n            <div class=\"step-title\">Monthly take-home dips, CTC unchanged<\/div>\n            <div class=\"step-note\">Money shifts from now to later, not a pay cut<\/div>\n          <\/div>\n        <\/div>\n      <\/div>\n      <div class=\"callout\">\n        <strong>Bottom line:<\/strong> Your CTC stays the same; the split between in-hand pay and retirement savings changes.\n      <\/div>\n    <\/div>\n    <div class=\"source\">Illustrative of direction only; no take-home percentage is stated as fact. Wage definition per the Code on Wages, 2019.<\/div>\n    <div class=\"branding\">LawSikho<\/div>\n  <\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/figure>\n\n<a id=\"h2-5\"><\/a><\/p>\n<h2>The Social Security Code: PF, ESI, gratuity and maternity benefit<\/h2>\n<p>The Code on Social Security, 2020 is the benefits code. It gathers the schemes that protect workers against old age, illness, injury, unemployment and childbirth into one framework, and then extends that framework, for the first time, toward gig and platform workers. It subsumes the EPF Act, the ESI Act, the Payment of Gratuity Act and the Maternity Benefit Act, among others.<\/p>\n<p>What does the Code actually cover? Provident fund, employees&#8217; state insurance, gratuity, maternity benefit, and enabling provisions for gig and platform-worker schemes. The <a href=\"https:\/\/www.indiacode.nic.in\/handle\/123456789\/16823\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Code on Social Security, 2020<\/a> carries the enabling architecture; the gig and platform provisions get their own section next, because they&#8217;re genuinely new. Everything in this section is overview-level by design. Each benefit has a dedicated spoke that carries the depth.<\/p>\n<a id=\"h3-5a\"><\/a>\n<h3>Provident fund and ESI, in brief<\/h3>\n<p>Provident fund and ESI both carried over into the Code with their core structures intact. PF remains a retirement-savings scheme funded by employer and employee contributions on the wage base. ESI remains a medical and cash-benefit scheme for employees below a wage ceiling, funded by employer and employee contributions.<\/p>\n<p>The interaction to watch is between the ESI and PF wage ceilings and the new 50% wage base. Because the wage base is now larger for allowance-heavy salaries, some employees who structured their way under a ceiling before may find the arithmetic has shifted. It&#8217;s a genuinely fiddly interaction, and it&#8217;s exactly the kind of thing that separates a compliant payroll from a fragile one.<\/p>\n<p>On the PF side, the contribution rates, the UAN and withdrawal carry the detail. On ESI, the wage-ceiling test decides eligibility, and the scheme pays both medical and cash benefits: <a href=\"\/blog\/esi-scheme-india\/\">ESI eligibility, contribution and benefits<\/a> are set out in full in the dedicated spoke.<\/p>\n<a id=\"h3-5b\"><\/a>\n<h3>Gratuity under the Code, including fixed-term staff<\/h3>\n<p>Gratuity survives the consolidation with its familiar shape: a lump sum payable to employees who complete a qualifying period of continuous service. The headline change is for fixed-term employees, who now earn pro-rata gratuity after one year, rather than the five-year threshold that still applies to permanent staff. That&#8217;s a substantial gain for contract-structured workforces.<\/p>\n<p>One nuance that experienced practitioners watch closely is forfeiture. Gratuity can be forfeited for proven misconduct or moral turpitude, but only through due process. In <a href=\"https:\/\/indiankanoon.org\/doc\/104483191\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Western Coalfields Ltd. v. Manohar Govinda Fulzele, 2025 INSC 233<\/a>, the Supreme Court held that a criminal conviction is not a prerequisite for forfeiture: an employer can forfeit gratuity for misconduct involving moral turpitude established through a departmental inquiry, provided the worker gets a fair hearing and the amount forfeited reflects the gravity of the misconduct. The practical takeaway is stable: forfeiture is possible, but it isn&#8217;t automatic, and shortcutting the process invites a challenge.<\/p>\n<p>Because the qualifying-service rules and the actual 15\/26 calculation are where readers most often go wrong, this hub stays at overview level. For <a href=\"\/blog\/gratuity-in-india\/\">the 15\/26 gratuity formula and who qualifies<\/a>, the eligibility test and the 2026 position, the dedicated spoke carries the step-by-step depth.<\/p>\n<a id=\"h3-5c\"><\/a>\n<h3>Maternity benefit under the Code<\/h3>\n<p>Maternity benefit carried forward into the Code, including the 26-week paid maternity leave entitlement and the associated employer duties around workload and nursing breaks. The Code preserves the protections of the earlier Maternity Benefit Act rather than diluting them.<\/p>\n<p>The eligibility conditions, the cr\u00e8che requirement and the employer-duty detail deserve a fuller treatment than a hub can give. The dedicated spoke on <a href=\"\/blog\/maternity-benefit-act-india\/\">the 26-week maternity entitlement and employer duties<\/a> covers who qualifies, how the leave is calculated, and what employers must provide.<\/p>\n<a id=\"h2-6\"><\/a>\n<h2>Gig and platform workers under the new labour codes<\/h2>\n<p>For the delivery rider, the cab driver and the freelance courier, this is the section that changes everything. For the first time in Indian law, gig and platform workers are a recognised legal category with a route to social security. Before the codes, they were &#8220;independent partners,&#8221; outside the employment net entirely. That&#8217;s over.<\/p>\n<p>The recognition sits in the Code on Social Security. Under the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.indiacode.nic.in\/handle\/123456789\/16823\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Code on Social Security, 2020<\/a>, the Central Government is empowered to frame welfare schemes for gig and platform workers, funded partly by the aggregators who engage them. The enabling provision is Section 114 of the Code. That scheme mechanism is what turns &#8220;recognition&#8221; into actual benefits.<\/p>\n<p>There&#8217;s real constitutional pressure behind this shift. A petition by the Indian Federation of App-based Transport Workers (IFAT) v. Union of India is pending before the Supreme Court. It seeks recognition of gig and platform workers as unorganised workers entitled to social security, arguing from Articles 14, 21 and 23. The matter is pending, and no outcome has been declared, so we state only that it&#8217;s before the Court and that it captures the constitutional argument the codes now partly address.<\/p>\n<a id=\"h3-6a\"><\/a>\n<h3>Who counts as a gig, platform or contract worker?<\/h3>\n<p>These three labels get muddled constantly, and the distinction decides which code and which entitlements apply. The table below draws the lines.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Table 5: Gig vs platform vs contract worker<\/strong><\/p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Category<\/th>\n<th>Simple definition<\/th>\n<th>Covered under<\/th>\n<th>Key entitlement<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Gig worker<\/td>\n<td>Works outside a traditional employer-employee relationship<\/td>\n<td>Code on Social Security<\/td>\n<td>e-Shram registration; scheme benefits<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Platform worker<\/td>\n<td>Does gig work through an online platform or aggregator<\/td>\n<td>Code on Social Security<\/td>\n<td>Aggregator-funded schemes<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Contract worker<\/td>\n<td>Engaged through a contractor for a principal employer<\/td>\n<td>OSH Code \/ IR Code<\/td>\n<td>Contractor-side statutory benefits<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>The everyday confusion is between &#8220;platform&#8221; and &#8220;contract.&#8221; A rider for a food-delivery app is a platform worker, engaged through an aggregator&#8217;s app. A housekeeping worker supplied to an office by a manpower agency is a contract worker, engaged through a contractor. Different codes, different obligations, different paperwork.<\/p>\n<a id=\"h3-6b\"><\/a>\n<h3>e-Shram registration and the gig eligibility threshold<\/h3>\n<p>e-Shram is the national database that gives unorganised and gig workers a Universal Account Number and access to scheme benefits. Registration is free. Say that twice, because scammers charge for it: e-Shram registration costs nothing, and anyone asking for a fee to register you is running a scam. You can register directly on the government e-Shram portal at eshram.gov.in.<\/p>\n<p>Eligibility for gig-worker social-security schemes is tied to a service threshold. Under the notified Social Security (Central) Rules, 2026, and subject to state rollout, a gig or platform worker qualifies after at least 90 days of work with a single aggregator, or 120 days across multiple aggregators, in the preceding financial year. A day counts if the worker earns any income from that aggregator on that day.<\/p>\n<p>That &#8220;across multiple platforms&#8221; point answers a question a lot of riders ask. If you drive for two apps, which threshold applies? The cumulative-days route is what recognises multi-app work, so your days across platforms can be counted together rather than each app being assessed in isolation. That&#8217;s precisely why the two-threshold design exists.<\/p>\n<a id=\"h3-6c\"><\/a>\n<h3>What aggregators must contribute<\/h3>\n<p>The funding model is what makes gig social security real rather than aspirational. Aggregators are required to contribute toward the workers&#8217; welfare fund. Under the notified Central Rules, and subject to state rollout, the contribution is 1 to 2% of the aggregator&#8217;s annual turnover, capped at 5% of the amount paid or payable to gig and platform workers. The levy is defined centrally; the collection machinery still depends on state operationalisation.<\/p>\n<p>Looking ahead, the direction of travel is clear even if the details are still settling. Gig-economy formalisation is set to deepen, with e-Shram linked to health cover and aggregator-funded schemes scaling as more states operationalise the rules, following extensions announced around the Budget for FY2025-26. Early signals suggest the net widens further, not narrower, over the next few years.<\/p>\n\n<!-- [SPOKE-A-PLACEHOLDER: Gig & platform workers deep-dive - no live spoke yet; add link when the Section-A spoke exists] -->\n\n<a id=\"h2-7\"><\/a>\n<h2>The Industrial Relations Code: hiring, firing and fixed-term employment<\/h2>\n<p>The Industrial Relations Code, 2020 is the one employers watch most nervously, because it governs unions, standing orders, and the rules for retrenchment, lay-off and closure. It folds together the Industrial Disputes Act, the Trade Unions Act and the Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act. This is the code that decides how much flexibility a business has to reshape its workforce.<\/p>\n<p>Who does it even cover? That question has a famous answer, and it&#8217;s the doctrinal backbone of the whole regime.<\/p>\n<a id=\"h3-7a\"><\/a>\n<h3>Who the IR Code covers, standing orders and retrenchment<\/h3>\n<p>The scope of industrial-relations law rests on the classic definition of &#8220;industry.&#8221; In <a href=\"https:\/\/indiankanoon.org\/doc\/1149369\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Bangalore Water Supply &amp; Sewerage Board v. A. Rajappa, (1978) 2 SCC 213<\/a>, a seven-judge Bench of the Supreme Court laid down the &#8220;triple test&#8221; for what counts as an industry, holding that profit motive and government identity are largely immaterial to the question. That expansive test is what the IR Code inherits when it defines the establishments its regime reaches.<\/p>\n<p>On retrenchment and standing orders, the Code raised the headcount threshold at which the stricter obligations (like prior government permission to retrench, lay off or close) kick in, from 100 to 300 workers. Under Sections 77 and 78 of the Industrial Relations Code, 2020, an establishment employing 300 or more workers needs prior government permission before retrenchment, lay-off or closure, and the standing-orders requirement now bites at the same 300-worker mark. The policy logic traces to reasoning like that in <a href=\"https:\/\/indiankanoon.org\/doc\/947038\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Excel Wear v. Union of India, (1978) 4 SCC 224<\/a>, where the Court recognised that the freedom to carry on a trade includes a reasonable freedom to close it, and that closure restrictions must themselves be reasonable.<\/p>\n<p>The practical effect is a shift in balance. Larger firms below the higher threshold gain flexibility to adjust headcount without prior permission. Whether that flexibility is used for genuine restructuring or for softer job security is exactly the debate the reform provoked.<\/p>\n<a id=\"h3-7b\"><\/a>\n<h3>Fixed-term employment: equal pay, notice and pro-rata gratuity<\/h3>\n<p>Fixed-term employment is now a formal statutory category, and this is one of the codes&#8217; most consequential quiet changes. A fixed-term employee is entitled to the same wages, hours and benefits as a permanent employee doing the same work, statutory benefits accrue pro-rata from day one, and gratuity vests after one year rather than five. That parity is the equal-work principle from the Code on Wages made specific.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Table 4: Fixed-term vs permanent employee<\/strong><\/p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Factor<\/th>\n<th>Fixed-term employee<\/th>\n<th>Permanent employee<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Wages, hours, allowances<\/td>\n<td>Parity for the same work<\/td>\n<td>Baseline<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Statutory benefits (PF, ESI)<\/td>\n<td>Pro-rata from day one<\/td>\n<td>Full<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Gratuity eligibility<\/td>\n<td>After one year (pro-rata)<\/td>\n<td>After five years<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Notice on non-renewal<\/td>\n<td>Per the contract term<\/td>\n<td>Per code and standing orders<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>Now the second-order effect. For years, the appeal of temp and contract labour was cost: lower benefits, easier exit. Fixed-term parity plus one-year gratuity shrinks that arbitrage. The predictable result is a hiring-mix shift, with employers weighing automation and genuine permanent hiring against a contract model that&#8217;s no longer as cheap as it was. Contract-staffing firms, whose business rested partly on that gap, are the ones feeling the pressure first.<\/p>\n<p>There&#8217;s a litigation frontier hiding in here too, and we pick it up later: disputes over whether a given worker is genuinely fixed-term, gig, or a disguised permanent employee. Classification is where the next few years of labour arguments will concentrate. (The gratuity mechanics that sit behind all this are covered in the gratuity spoke linked earlier in the Social Security section, so we won&#8217;t repeat that route here.)<\/p>\n<!-- [SPOKE-A-PLACEHOLDER: IR Code \/ fixed-term employment deep-dive - no live spoke yet; add link when the Section-A spoke exists] -->\n\n<a id=\"h2-8\"><\/a>\n<h2>The OSH Code: working hours, overtime, appointment letters and safety<\/h2>\n<p>The Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions Code, 2020 governs the physical and contractual conditions of work: how long you work, what overtime you&#8217;re owed, whether you get an appointment letter, and how safe your workplace has to be. It consolidates the Factories Act, the Contract Labour Act, the Inter-State Migrant Workmen Act and several others into one regime.<\/p>\n<p>This is also the code where the &#8220;how many hours can they make me work?&#8221; questions get answered. So let&#8217;s answer them, with the appropriate caution about numbers that sources still report inconsistently.<\/p>\n<a id=\"h3-8a\"><\/a>\n<h3>Working hours, overtime and the four-day week<\/h3>\n<p>The framework sets a daily and weekly cap on working hours, anchored on a 48-hour week. Under the notified OSH Central Rules, 2026, normal working hours are eight in a day, and work beyond eight hours a day or 48 hours a week is treated as overtime. Overtime is paid at twice the ordinary wage rate. A quarterly overtime ceiling of 144 hours also applies, so overtime cannot be stacked on you without limit.<\/p>\n<p>Can your employer force overtime on you? Overtime generally requires the framework&#8217;s conditions to be met and is compensated at the double rate, and the quarterly ceiling exists precisely to cap how much overtime can be stacked on you. So there&#8217;s a limit by design: 144 hours in any quarter.<\/p>\n<p>And the four-day week everyone keeps asking about? It&#8217;s permitted, but with a catch. A four-day week works by lengthening daily shifts so the weekly hours still fit under the 48-hour cap, and it typically requires employee consent and a guaranteed rest day. You don&#8217;t get a shorter total week; you get the same weekly hours compressed into fewer, longer days. Whether the standard week or the compressed week applies is an employer choice within the rules, not an automatic employee right.<\/p>\n<!-- [SPOKE-A-PLACEHOLDER: OSH Code \/ working hours deep-dive - no live spoke yet; add link when the Section-A spoke exists] -->\n\n<a id=\"h3-8b\"><\/a>\n<h3>Mandatory appointment letters and full-and-final settlement<\/h3>\n<p>Here&#8217;s a change that sounds small and matters enormously. Appointment letters are now mandatory for every worker, including in the unorganised sector where written contracts were rare. That single requirement gives millions of workers documentary proof of employment for the first time, which is the foundation for claiming every other statutory right.<\/p>\n<p>Full-and-final settlement on exit also got a deadline. Under Section 17(2) of the Code on Wages, 2019, wages must be paid within two working days of an employee&#8217;s removal, dismissal, retrenchment or resignation. That is a firm move toward faster settlement of dues than the open-ended delays workers often faced before.<\/p>\n<p>If you&#8217;re drafting or reviewing employment paperwork, the appointment letter is now a compliance document, not a formality. Our guide on <a href=\"\/blog\/employment-agreement-drafting-india\/\">what a compliant appointment letter must contain<\/a> sets out the clauses that matter under the new regime.<\/p>\n<a id=\"h3-8c\"><\/a>\n<h3>Workplace safety and the Inspector-cum-Facilitator regime<\/h3>\n<p>On safety and welfare, the OSH Code standardises obligations across factories, construction sites and migrant-worker arrangements that were previously governed by separate statutes with different standards. The aim is a common baseline rather than a patchwork.<\/p>\n<!-- [SPOKE-A-PLACEHOLDER: OSH Code \/ workplace safety deep-dive - no live spoke yet; add link when the Section-A spoke exists] -->\n\n<p>The enforcement posture shifted too, from the old &#8220;inspector&#8221; model toward an &#8220;Inspector-cum-Facilitator,&#8221; meant to advise and facilitate compliance as well as police it. Whether that softens enforcement or simply modernises it is something practitioners are still watching. For the operational to-do list that flows from all of this, route to <a href=\"\/blog\/new-labour-code-compliance-checklist-india-2026\/\">the full new labour code compliance checklist<\/a> rather than trying to build it from this overview, since the checklist post carries the step-by-step depth that a hub deliberately doesn&#8217;t.<\/p>\n\n<a id=\"h2-9\"><\/a>\n<h2>New labour codes vs old labour laws: what actually changed<\/h2>\n<p>If you want the whole reform on one screen, this is it. The tables below map the old position to the new code position and tell you what it means in practice. Competitors tend to skip clean comparison tables, which is a missed opportunity, because this is exactly the format that answers &#8220;what changed for me?&#8221; fastest.<\/p>\n<!-- INFOGRAPHIC 2: old-labour-laws-vs-new-codes.html: old-vs-new card grid built from Table 2 -->\n\n<a id=\"h3-9a\"><\/a>\n<h3>Old provision vs new code: what changed for you<\/h3>\n<p><strong>Table 2: Old provision, new code, and what it means for you<\/strong><\/p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Area<\/th>\n<th>Old law \/ position<\/th>\n<th>New code position<\/th>\n<th>What it means for you<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Definition of &#8220;wages&#8221;<\/td>\n<td>Varied Act to Act; allowances often excluded<\/td>\n<td>Basic + DA must be at least 50% of total remuneration<\/td>\n<td>Higher PF and gratuity base; take-home may dip<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Gig and platform workers<\/td>\n<td>Not a legal category<\/td>\n<td>Recognised; aggregator-funded schemes<\/td>\n<td>Social-security net and e-Shram registration<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Fixed-term employment<\/td>\n<td>Informal; unequal benefits<\/td>\n<td>Statutory category; parity plus one-year gratuity<\/td>\n<td>Equal pay and benefits; earlier gratuity<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Appointment letters<\/td>\n<td>Not universally mandatory<\/td>\n<td>Mandatory for all workers<\/td>\n<td>Written proof of employment for everyone<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Retrenchment threshold<\/td>\n<td>100 workers<\/td>\n<td>300 workers (IR Code ss. 77-78)<\/td>\n<td>Larger firms gain hiring flexibility<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Overtime pay<\/td>\n<td>Varied by statute<\/td>\n<td>Twice the wage rate; quarterly cap<\/td>\n<td>Clearer overtime entitlement<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>The second table answers the &#8220;which old law went where?&#8221; question, mapping the 29 repealed central Acts onto their new home code.<\/p>\n<a id=\"h3-9b\"><\/a>\n<h3>Which of the 29 old laws went where<\/h3>\n<p><strong>Table 3: The 29 old laws grouped under the four codes<\/strong><\/p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>New code<\/th>\n<th>Illustrative old Acts subsumed<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Code on Wages, 2019<\/td>\n<td>Minimum Wages Act 1948, Payment of Wages Act 1936, Payment of Bonus Act 1965, Equal Remuneration Act 1976<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Industrial Relations Code, 2020<\/td>\n<td>Industrial Disputes Act 1947, Trade Unions Act 1926, Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act 1946<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Code on Social Security, 2020<\/td>\n<td>EPF Act 1952, ESI Act 1948, Payment of Gratuity Act 1972, Maternity Benefit Act 1961, and further social-security statutes<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>OSH Code, 2020<\/td>\n<td>Factories Act 1948, Contract Labour Act 1970, Inter-State Migrant Workmen Act 1979, and further safety and welfare statutes<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>The full, verified 29-law list is the kind of thing worth checking against the labour ministry&#8217;s own notification, since the grouping above is illustrative rather than exhaustive. The pattern, though, is the point: wages together, industrial relations together, social security together, safety together.<\/p>\n<p>\n\n<figure class=\"ls-infographic-wrap\" style=\"margin:2rem 0;\">\n<div class=\"ls-ig-oldnew\" style=\"margin:2rem 0;max-width:800px;\">\n<style>\n.ls-ig-oldnew, .ls-ig-oldnew *, .ls-ig-oldnew *::before, .ls-ig-oldnew *::after { box-sizing: border-box; }\n.ls-ig-oldnew { font-family: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, 'Segoe UI', Roboto, sans-serif; color: #212121; }\n.ls-ig-oldnew .infographic { max-width: 800px; margin: 0 auto; border: 1px solid #e0e0e0; border-radius: 8px; overflow: hidden; background:#ffffff; }\n.ls-ig-oldnew .title-bar { background: #1a237e; color: #ffffff; padding: 20px 24px; text-align: center; }\n.ls-ig-oldnew .title-bar h2 { font-size: 20px; font-weight: 700; margin:0; }\n.ls-ig-oldnew .title-bar .subtitle { font-size: 14px; font-weight: 400; margin-top: 6px; opacity: 0.9; }\n.ls-ig-oldnew .content { padding: 20px; display: grid; grid-template-columns: repeat(2, 1fr); gap: 16px; }\n.ls-ig-oldnew .card { border: 1px solid #e0e0e0; border-radius: 8px; overflow: hidden; display: flex; flex-direction: column; }\n.ls-ig-oldnew .card-area { background: #ff6f00; color: #ffffff; font-size: 14px; font-weight: 700; padding: 10px 14px; }\n.ls-ig-oldnew .card-body { padding: 12px 14px; display: flex; flex-direction: column; gap: 10px; flex: 1; }\n.ls-ig-oldnew .row-old, .ls-ig-oldnew .row-new, .ls-ig-oldnew .row-mean { font-size: 13px; line-height: 1.45; }\n.ls-ig-oldnew .label { display: inline-block; font-size: 11px; font-weight: 700; text-transform: uppercase; letter-spacing: 0.4px; margin-bottom: 3px; }\n.ls-ig-oldnew .row-old .label { color: #757575; }\n.ls-ig-oldnew .row-new .label { color: #1a237e; }\n.ls-ig-oldnew .row-mean { background: #f5f5f5; border-radius: 6px; padding: 8px 10px; margin-top: 2px; }\n.ls-ig-oldnew .row-mean .label { color: #ff6f00; }\n.ls-ig-oldnew .row-old .val { color: #616161; }\n.ls-ig-oldnew .row-new .val { color: #212121; font-weight: 600; }\n.ls-ig-oldnew .arrow { color: #ff6f00; font-weight: 700; }\n.ls-ig-oldnew .branding { text-align: right; padding: 12px 24px; font-size: 12px; color: #9e9e9e; border-top: 1px solid #e0e0e0; }\n.ls-ig-oldnew .source { font-size: 12px; color: #757575; padding: 4px 24px 0; }\n@media (max-width: 600px) {\n  .ls-ig-oldnew .content { grid-template-columns: 1fr; padding: 16px; }\n  .ls-ig-oldnew .title-bar h2 { font-size: 17px; }\n  .ls-ig-oldnew .title-bar { padding: 16px; }\n}\n<\/style>\n  <div class=\"infographic\" role=\"img\" aria-label=\"Old labour laws versus new labour codes in India 2026 comparison\">\n    <div class=\"title-bar\">\n      <h2>Old labour laws vs new labour codes<\/h2>\n      <div class=\"subtitle\">Six areas where India&#8217;s 2026 codes changed the position<\/div>\n    <\/div>\n    <div class=\"content\">\n      <div class=\"card\">\n        <div class=\"card-area\">Definition of wages<\/div>\n        <div class=\"card-body\">\n          <div class=\"row-old\"><span class=\"label\">Old law<\/span><span class=\"val\">Varied Act to Act; allowances often excluded<\/span><\/div>\n          <div class=\"row-new\"><span class=\"label\">New code <span class=\"arrow\">&rarr;<\/span><\/span><span class=\"val\">Basic + DA at least 50% of total remuneration<\/span><\/div>\n          <div class=\"row-mean\"><span class=\"label\">What it means for you<\/span>Higher PF and gratuity base; take-home may dip<\/div>\n        <\/div>\n      <\/div>\n      <div class=\"card\">\n        <div class=\"card-area\">Gig and platform workers<\/div>\n        <div class=\"card-body\">\n          <div class=\"row-old\"><span class=\"label\">Old law<\/span><span class=\"val\">Not a legal category<\/span><\/div>\n          <div class=\"row-new\"><span class=\"label\">New code <span class=\"arrow\">&rarr;<\/span><\/span><span class=\"val\">Recognised; aggregator-funded schemes<\/span><\/div>\n          <div class=\"row-mean\"><span class=\"label\">What it means for you<\/span>Social-security net and e-Shram registration<\/div>\n        <\/div>\n      <\/div>\n      <div class=\"card\">\n        <div class=\"card-area\">Fixed-term employment<\/div>\n        <div class=\"card-body\">\n          <div class=\"row-old\"><span class=\"label\">Old law<\/span><span class=\"val\">Informal; unequal benefits<\/span><\/div>\n          <div class=\"row-new\"><span class=\"label\">New code <span class=\"arrow\">&rarr;<\/span><\/span><span class=\"val\">Statutory category; parity plus one-year gratuity<\/span><\/div>\n          <div class=\"row-mean\"><span class=\"label\">What it means for you<\/span>Equal pay and benefits; earlier gratuity<\/div>\n        <\/div>\n      <\/div>\n      <div class=\"card\">\n        <div class=\"card-area\">Appointment letters<\/div>\n        <div class=\"card-body\">\n          <div class=\"row-old\"><span class=\"label\">Old law<\/span><span class=\"val\">Not universally mandatory<\/span><\/div>\n          <div class=\"row-new\"><span class=\"label\">New code <span class=\"arrow\">&rarr;<\/span><\/span><span class=\"val\">Mandatory for all workers<\/span><\/div>\n          <div class=\"row-mean\"><span class=\"label\">What it means for you<\/span>Written proof of employment for everyone<\/div>\n        <\/div>\n      <\/div>\n      <div class=\"card\">\n        <div class=\"card-area\">Retrenchment threshold<\/div>\n        <div class=\"card-body\">\n          <div class=\"row-old\"><span class=\"label\">Old law<\/span><span class=\"val\">100 workers<\/span><\/div>\n          <div class=\"row-new\"><span class=\"label\">New code <span class=\"arrow\">&rarr;<\/span><\/span><span class=\"val\">Raised; reported at 300 workers<\/span><\/div>\n          <div class=\"row-mean\"><span class=\"label\">What it means for you<\/span>Larger firms gain hiring flexibility<\/div>\n        <\/div>\n      <\/div>\n      <div class=\"card\">\n        <div class=\"card-area\">Overtime pay<\/div>\n        <div class=\"card-body\">\n          <div class=\"row-old\"><span class=\"label\">Old law<\/span><span class=\"val\">Varied by statute<\/span><\/div>\n          <div class=\"row-new\"><span class=\"label\">New code <span class=\"arrow\">&rarr;<\/span><\/span><span class=\"val\">Twice the wage rate; quarterly cap<\/span><\/div>\n          <div class=\"row-mean\"><span class=\"label\">What it means for you<\/span>Clearer overtime entitlement<\/div>\n        <\/div>\n      <\/div>\n    <\/div>\n    <div class=\"source\">Built from the draft&#8217;s old-vs-new comparison (Table 2). The higher retrenchment threshold is reported at 300 workers, subject to the notified rules.<\/div>\n    <div class=\"branding\">LawSikho<\/div>\n  <\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/figure>\n\n<a id=\"h2-10\"><\/a><\/p>\n<h2>Are the labour codes in force yet? Implementation status in 2026<\/h2>\n<p>This is the question that trips up almost every reader, because the honest answer has three moving parts. Are the codes actually enforceable in 2026, or just &#8220;notified&#8221;? The precise status matters, because acting on the wrong assumption is how compliance mistakes and missed obligations happen.<\/p>\n<p>Here&#8217;s the status map as of July 2026. The four codes were brought into force on 21 November 2025. The final Central Rules were notified on 8 May 2026. And state rules, which operationalise the codes at ground level, are rolling out unevenly, with states such as Gujarat, Haryana, Madhya Pradesh, Karnataka and Maharashtra reported to be among those further along. Different articles quote 21 November 2025, 1 April 2026, or 8 May 2026 as &#8220;the date&#8221; because each is a different milestone: commencement, a proposed enforcement target, and the Central Rules notification respectively.<\/p>\n<p>Looking forward, expect the picture to keep converging. Advisory alerts from firms tracking the rollout anticipate phased &#8220;full enforceability&#8221; through 2026 and 2027 as states align on a common commencement approach. The direction is toward uniformity, but the timeline is still genuinely uncertain, so build your compliance plan around your own state&#8217;s status rather than a national assumption.<\/p>\n<a id=\"h3-10a\"><\/a>\n<h3>Notified vs enforceable vs state-rule status<\/h3>\n<p>Three words that get used interchangeably, and shouldn&#8217;t be. &#8220;Notified&#8221; means the government has officially published the code or the rule. &#8220;In force&#8221; or &#8220;commenced&#8221; means the law has legally taken effect. &#8220;Enforceable in practice&#8221; depends on whether the operational rules, including the state rules, exist to apply it. A code can be notified and in force while parts of its practical enforcement still wait on state rules.<\/p>\n<p>That distinction is the single most useful thing to carry out of this section. When a headline says the codes are &#8220;in force,&#8221; that&#8217;s true at the central level from 21 November 2025. Whether every obligation bites in your state on a given day is a separate question with a state-specific answer.<\/p>\n<a id=\"h3-10b\"><\/a>\n<h3>Central Rules vs State Rules: who governs what<\/h3>\n<p>The division follows the Concurrent List logic from earlier. The Central Government frames the Central Rules, which set the baseline machinery. State Governments frame their own rules for matters within their domain, which is why registers, forms, thresholds and certain procedural details can vary by state.<\/p>\n<p>So what applies to you if your state hasn&#8217;t finished notifying its rules? In broad terms, the codes and the Central Rules set the framework, while some obligations await state operationalisation, so the practical answer genuinely depends on your state and establishment type. That&#8217;s not a dodge; it&#8217;s the actual legal position, and it&#8217;s why blanket &#8220;here&#8217;s what applies everywhere&#8221; claims should be treated with suspicion right now.<\/p>\n\n<a id=\"h2-11\"><\/a>\n<h2>What the new labour codes mean for employees, employers and startups<\/h2>\n<p>Three audiences, three very different reading lists. The codes touch each group at a different point, so this section pulls the threads together and points each reader to where the depth lives. What does compliance actually demand right now, and who bears it?<\/p>\n<a id=\"h3-11a\"><\/a>\n<h3>For employees<\/h3>\n<p>If you draw a salary, the headline effects are on your payslip and your protections. Your take-home may have dipped as the 50% wage rule lifted your PF and gratuity base, even though your CTC held steady, and that&#8217;s a shift in the timing of your money rather than a cut. Your rights also expanded: parity if you&#8217;re on a fixed-term contract, an appointment letter as a matter of right, and faster settlement of dues on exit. The salary mechanics sit in the take-home section above, and the benefit depth sits in the spokes.<\/p>\n<a id=\"h3-11b\"><\/a>\n<h3>For employers and HR<\/h3>\n<p>For employers, the codes are a compliance project with real teeth. In our view, the smart move is to fix the wage definition first, because it cascades straight into PF, gratuity and bonus. The overview-level shortlist: restructure salaries to meet the 50% wage definition, update PF and gratuity calculations to the new base, issue compliant appointment letters to every worker, tighten full-and-final settlement timelines, and track your state&#8217;s rule status. Penalties for non-compliance apply and can escalate for repeat or serious breaches, so this isn&#8217;t optional housekeeping.<\/p>\n<p>We&#8217;re deliberately not reproducing the full checklist here, because a hub that tries to be a checklist serves neither purpose well. The step-by-step, form-by-form version lives in our dedicated compliance-checklist post, and that&#8217;s where HR teams should go to actually execute. This section tells you what the buckets are; that post tells you how to empty them.<\/p>\n<a id=\"h3-11c\"><\/a>\n<h3>For startups and small establishments<\/h3>\n<p>Founders ask the same question first: do the codes even apply to us at our size? Broadly, yes, the codes apply across establishments, though certain thresholds (like the raised retrenchment headcount, or specific standing-order obligations) only bite above a worker-count. So a small startup is covered by the wage, social-security and appointment-letter obligations from the start, while some of the heavier industrial-relations machinery only engages as you scale. Our advice to founders is to build the wage-structuring and appointment-letter discipline in early, because retrofitting it after a few dozen hires is the painful path.<\/p>\n<p>Now the second-order effect that ties this section together. The next two to three years of labour litigation are likely to concentrate on two fault lines: worker classification (is this person gig, fixed-term, contract or a disguised permanent employee?) and state-rule enforceability gaps (does this obligation actually bite where my rules aren&#8217;t notified?). Employers who document classification decisions and state-readiness now are the ones least exposed when those disputes arrive.<\/p>\n<a id=\"h2-12\"><\/a>\n<h2>Pay, benefits and social security: explore the labour law cluster<\/h2>\n<p>This guide is the hub. Each benefit and pay topic below has a focused companion piece that carries the calculations, eligibility tests and worked examples a hub deliberately leaves out. Think of this as your map into the &#8220;Pay, Benefits and Social Security&#8221; cluster.<\/p>\n<p><strong><a href=\"\/blog\/gratuity-in-india\/\">Gratuity in India<\/a>.<\/strong> How the qualifying period works, the five-year rule (one year for fixed-term staff), and the 2026 position on eligibility and forfeiture.<\/p>\n<p><strong><a href=\"\/blog\/epf-provident-fund-india\/\">EPF and provident fund<\/a>.<\/strong> Contribution rules on the new wage base, the Universal Account Number, and how withdrawal actually works.<\/p>\n<p><strong><a href=\"\/blog\/esi-scheme-india\/\">ESI scheme<\/a>.<\/strong> The wage-ceiling eligibility test, employer and employee contribution rates, and the medical and cash benefits the scheme pays.<\/p>\n<p><strong><a href=\"\/blog\/minimum-wages-national-floor-wage-india\/\">Minimum wages and the National Floor Wage<\/a>.<\/strong> How the national floor and state minimum wages fit together under the Code on Wages, and why the numbers vary by state.<\/p>\n<p><strong><a href=\"\/blog\/payment-of-bonus-india\/\">Payment of bonus<\/a>.<\/strong> Who qualifies for statutory bonus, the wage ceiling, and how the calculation works under the Code on Wages.<\/p>\n<p><strong><a href=\"\/blog\/maternity-benefit-act-india\/\">Maternity benefit<\/a>.<\/strong> The 26-week entitlement, who&#8217;s eligible, and what employers must provide.<\/p>\n<p>Deeper guides to each of the four codes themselves, with the calculations, thresholds and worked examples this hub keeps out, join the cluster as they publish.<\/p>\n<!-- [SPOKE-A-PLACEHOLDER: \"The four codes in depth\" sub-list - Wage Code \/ Social Security \/ IR \/ OSH deep-dives not yet live; add links when the Section-A spokes exist] -->\n\n\n<a id=\"h2-13\"><\/a>\n<h2>Frequently asked questions<\/h2>\n<p><strong>1. What are the four new labour codes in India?<\/strong>\nThe four codes are the Code on Wages, 2019, the Industrial Relations Code, 2020, the Code on Social Security, 2020, and the Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions Code, 2020. Together they replace 29 older central labour laws.<\/p>\n<p><strong>2. When did the new labour codes come into force?<\/strong>\nAll four labour codes came into force on 21 November 2025, repealing 29 legacy central statutes the same day. The final Central Rules that operationalise them were notified on 8 May 2026. State rules, needed for full ground-level enforcement, are still rolling out unevenly.<\/p>\n<p><strong>3. Which old labour laws do the four codes replace?<\/strong>\nThe codes subsumed 29 central Acts, including the Minimum Wages Act 1948, Payment of Wages Act 1936, Industrial Disputes Act 1947, EPF Act 1952, ESI Act 1948, Payment of Gratuity Act 1972, Maternity Benefit Act 1961 and Factories Act 1948, grouping them under the four codes by subject.<\/p>\n<p><strong>4. What is the 50% wage rule and what does it mean?<\/strong>\nThe 50% wage rule requires that basic pay and dearness allowance together make up at least half of total remuneration. Allowances above that ceiling are added back into the wage base used for provident fund, gratuity and other statutory calculations. It standardises how salary is structured.<\/p>\n<p><strong>5. Will my take-home salary decrease under the new labour codes?<\/strong>\nFor some employees, yes: monthly take-home can dip because a larger share of pay moves into provident fund and gratuity under the 50% wage rule. Your total CTC doesn&#8217;t change; the split between in-hand pay and savings does. Reported estimates suggest roughly 5 to 10% for allowance-heavy salaries.<\/p>\n<p><strong>6. Will my PF contribution increase, and by how much?<\/strong>\nIf your salary was structured with allowances above the 50% ceiling, your provident fund contribution can rise, because the wage base it&#8217;s calculated on increases. The exact amount depends on your existing structure. Employees whose basic-plus-DA already exceeded 50% may see little change.<\/p>\n<p><strong>7. Are gig and platform workers now covered by law?<\/strong>\nYes. The Code on Social Security recognises gig and platform workers as a legal category for the first time and lets the government frame welfare schemes for them, funded partly by aggregators. Workers register on the e-Shram portal to access those benefits.<\/p>\n<p><strong>8. What is the 90-day rule for gig-worker social security?<\/strong>\nUnder the notified Social Security (Central) Rules, 2026, a gig or platform worker qualifies with at least 90 days of work on a single aggregator, or 120 days across multiple aggregators, in the preceding financial year. A day counts if the worker earns any income from that aggregator that day.<\/p>\n<p><strong>9. How much must aggregators contribute for gig workers?<\/strong>\nUnder Section 114 of the Code on Social Security, 2020 and the notified Central Rules, aggregators contribute 1 to 2% of their annual turnover toward gig-worker welfare, capped at 5% of the amount paid or payable to those workers. State rollout still affects when schemes go live.<\/p>\n<p><strong>10. Is e-Shram registration free?<\/strong>\nYes, e-Shram registration is completely free through the official portal at eshram.gov.in. Anyone charging a fee to register you is running a scam. Registration generates a Universal Account Number that links a worker to social-security scheme benefits, so do it directly.<\/p>\n<p><strong>11. What are the new working-hour limits?<\/strong>\nThe framework anchors on a standard 48-hour working week, with a daily cap of eight hours under the notified OSH Central Rules, 2026. Work beyond eight hours a day or 48 hours a week is treated as overtime and compensated at twice the ordinary wage rate, subject to a quarterly ceiling of 144 hours.<\/p>\n<p><strong>12. How is overtime calculated under the new codes?<\/strong>\nOvertime is paid at twice the ordinary wage rate under the OSH framework. A quarterly ceiling of 144 hours on total overtime also applies under the notified OSH Central Rules, 2026, so overtime cannot be stacked without limit. The double-rate principle is the consistent anchor across the codes.<\/p>\n<p><strong>13. Is a four-day work week now allowed in India?<\/strong>\nA four-day week is permitted, but it doesn&#8217;t shorten your total hours. It compresses the standard weekly hours into fewer, longer working days, keeping the 48-hour weekly cap intact, and it typically needs employee consent and a guaranteed weekly rest day.<\/p>\n<p><strong>14. What changed for maternity benefit?<\/strong>\nThe Code on Social Security carries forward the existing maternity protections, including 26 weeks of paid leave and associated employer duties. The consolidation preserves these entitlements rather than reducing them. Detailed eligibility and cr\u00e8che requirements sit in the maternity spoke.<\/p>\n<p><strong>15. What are the new gratuity rules in 2026?<\/strong>\nGratuity continues as a lump sum for employees who complete the qualifying service period, calculated on the last-drawn wage base, now larger under the 50% rule. The headline change: fixed-term staff earn pro-rata gratuity after one year, not five. Forfeiture still needs due process.<\/p>\n<p><strong>16. Are fixed-term employees eligible for gratuity after one year?<\/strong>\nYes. Under the codes, fixed-term employees become eligible for pro-rata gratuity after one year of service, a change from the five-year threshold that still applies to permanent staff. It sits alongside their new right to pay and benefit parity with permanent employees doing the same work.<\/p>\n<p><strong>17. Is an appointment letter now mandatory for every employee?<\/strong>\nYes. The OSH Code makes appointment letters mandatory for every worker, including in the unorganised sector where written contracts were rare. This gives workers documentary proof of employment, the foundation for claiming provident fund, gratuity and other statutory rights.<\/p>\n<p><strong>18. Are the codes actually enforceable yet, or just &#8220;notified&#8221;?<\/strong>\nBoth. The codes are in force nationally from 21 November 2025, and the Central Rules were notified on 8 May 2026. But full ground-level enforcement often depends on state rules, which are rolling out unevenly. So the codes are legally in force, while some obligations track your state.<\/p>\n<p><strong>19. What is the full-and-final settlement timeline now?<\/strong>\nUnder Section 17(2) of the Code on Wages, an employee&#8217;s wages must be settled in full within two working days of resignation, removal, dismissal or retrenchment. That sharply tightens the older practice, where settlements could drag on for weeks. Gratuity keeps its own separate payment timeline.<\/p>\n<p><strong>20. What are the penalties for non-compliance in 2026?<\/strong>\nThe codes carry graded penalties that scale with the seriousness of the breach and whether it&#8217;s repeated, from monetary fines to imprisonment for serious or repeat violations, with many offences compoundable. Confirm the specific penalty against the notified rules.<\/p>\n<p><strong>21. How many labour laws are there in India in 2026?<\/strong>\nAt the central level, India&#8217;s labour laws are now consolidated into four codes, which replaced the earlier patchwork of 29 separate central Acts. State laws and rules still operate alongside them, since labour is on the Concurrent List. So the clean answer is four central codes plus state rules.<\/p>\n<a id=\"h2-14\"><\/a>\n<h2>References<\/h2>\n<a id=\"h3-14a\"><\/a>\n<h3>Case Law<\/h3>\n<ol>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/indiankanoon.org\/doc\/595099\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Bandhua Mukti Morcha v. Union of India, (1984) 3 SCC 161<\/a>. AIR 1984 SC 802.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/indiankanoon.org\/doc\/1149369\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Bangalore Water Supply &amp; Sewerage Board v. A. Rajappa, (1978) 2 SCC 213<\/a>. AIR 1978 SC 548; seven-judge Constitution Bench.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/indiankanoon.org\/doc\/947038\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Excel Wear v. Union of India, (1978) 4 SCC 224<\/a>. AIR 1979 SC 25.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scobserver.in\/cases\/gig-workers-access-to-social-security-the-indian-federation-of-app-based-transport-workers-ifat-v-union-of-india\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Indian Federation of App-based Transport Workers (IFAT) v. Union of India<\/a>. Writ Petition (Civil), Supreme Court Diary No. 22576 of 2021; pending before the Supreme Court, no final judgment as of July 2026.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/indiankanoon.org\/doc\/496663\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">People&#8217;s Union for Democratic Rights v. Union of India, (1982) 3 SCC 235<\/a>. AIR 1982 SC 1473 (Asiad Workers case).<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/indiankanoon.org\/doc\/1230349\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Randhir Singh v. Union of India, (1982) 1 SCC 618<\/a>. AIR 1982 SC 879.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/indiankanoon.org\/doc\/126246109\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Regional Provident Fund Commissioner (II), West Bengal v. Vivekananda Vidyamandir &amp; Ors., AIR 2019 SC 1240<\/a>. 2019 SCC OnLine SC 291.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/indiankanoon.org\/doc\/61133306\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Surya Roshni Ltd. v. Employees&#8217; Provident Fund &amp; Ors., 2019 SCC OnLine SC 291<\/a>. Companion appeal decided with Vivekananda Vidyamandir on 28 February 2019.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/indiankanoon.org\/doc\/104483191\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Western Coal Fields Ltd. v. Manohar Govinda Fulzele, 2025 INSC 233<\/a>. Supreme Court, 17 February 2025.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<a id=\"h3-14b\"><\/a>\n<h3>Statutes<\/h3>\n<ol>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.indiacode.nic.in\/handle\/123456789\/15793\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Code on Wages, 2019<\/a>. Sections cited: 2(y), 17(2).<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.indiacode.nic.in\/handle\/123456789\/16823\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Code on Social Security, 2020<\/a>. Sections cited: 53, 114.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.indiacode.nic.in\/handle\/123456789\/22040\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Industrial Relations Code, 2020<\/a>.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.indiacode.nic.in\/handle\/123456789\/22041\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions Code, 2020<\/a>.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>This article is for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The labour codes and their rules are being operationalised unevenly across states, and several figures cited here are drawn from notified rules and reported estimates that may still be revised. Verify the current position against the notified Central and State Rules and your establishment&#8217;s specific status, and consult a qualified legal professional for advice on your situation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\">\n{\n  \"@context\": \"https:\/\/schema.org\",\n  \"@type\": \"Article\",\n  \"headline\": \"Labour Laws in India 2026: New Labour Codes Guide\",\n  \"description\": \"Labour laws in India changed on 21 November 2025. Understand the four new labour codes, the 50% wage rule, gig-worker rights and 2026 HR compliance.\",\n  \"author\": {\n    \"@type\": \"Organization\",\n    \"name\": \"LawSikho\",\n    \"url\": \"https:\/\/lawsikho.com\"\n  },\n  \"publisher\": {\n    \"@type\": \"Organization\",\n    \"name\": \"LawSikho\",\n    \"logo\": {\n      \"@type\": \"ImageObject\",\n      \"url\": \"https:\/\/lawsikho.com\/logo.png\"\n    }\n  },\n  \"datePublished\": \"2026-07-13\",\n  \"dateModified\": \"2026-07-13\",\n  \"mainEntityOfPage\": {\n    \"@type\": \"WebPage\",\n    \"@id\": \"https:\/\/lawsikho.com\/blog\/labour-laws-in-india\"\n  },\n  \"image\": \"https:\/\/lawsikho.com\/blog\/images\/labour-laws-in-india-2026-featured.png\",\n  \"citation\": [\n    {\n      \"@type\": \"Legislation\",\n      \"name\": \"Code on Wages, 2019\",\n      \"url\": \"https:\/\/www.indiacode.nic.in\/handle\/123456789\/15793\",\n      \"legislationJurisdiction\": \"IN\"\n    },\n    {\n      \"@type\": \"Legislation\",\n      \"name\": \"Industrial Relations Code, 2020\",\n      \"url\": \"https:\/\/www.indiacode.nic.in\/handle\/123456789\/22040\",\n      \"legislationJurisdiction\": \"IN\"\n    },\n    {\n      \"@type\": \"Legislation\",\n      \"name\": \"Code on Social Security, 2020\",\n      \"url\": \"https:\/\/www.indiacode.nic.in\/handle\/123456789\/16823\",\n      \"legislationJurisdiction\": \"IN\"\n    },\n    {\n      \"@type\": \"Legislation\",\n      \"name\": \"Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions Code, 2020\",\n      \"url\": \"https:\/\/www.indiacode.nic.in\/handle\/123456789\/22041\",\n      \"legislationJurisdiction\": \"IN\"\n    },\n    {\n      \"@type\": \"CreativeWork\",\n      \"name\": \"Regional Provident Fund Commissioner (II), West Bengal v. Vivekananda Vidyamandir & Ors.\",\n      \"identifier\": \"AIR 2019 SC 1240\",\n      \"url\": \"https:\/\/indiankanoon.org\/doc\/126246109\/\",\n      \"datePublished\": \"2019-02-28\"\n    },\n    {\n      \"@type\": \"CreativeWork\",\n      \"name\": \"Surya Roshni Ltd. v. Employees' Provident Fund & Ors.\",\n      \"identifier\": \"2019 SCC OnLine SC 291\",\n      \"url\": \"https:\/\/indiankanoon.org\/doc\/61133306\/\",\n      \"datePublished\": \"2019-02-28\"\n    },\n    {\n      \"@type\": \"CreativeWork\",\n      \"name\": \"Bandhua Mukti Morcha v. Union of India\",\n      \"identifier\": \"(1984) 3 SCC 161\",\n      \"url\": \"https:\/\/indiankanoon.org\/doc\/595099\/\",\n      \"datePublished\": \"1983-12-16\"\n    },\n    {\n      \"@type\": \"CreativeWork\",\n      \"name\": \"People's Union for Democratic Rights v. Union of India\",\n      \"identifier\": \"(1982) 3 SCC 235\",\n      \"url\": \"https:\/\/indiankanoon.org\/doc\/496663\/\",\n      \"datePublished\": \"1982-09-18\"\n    },\n    {\n      \"@type\": \"CreativeWork\",\n      \"name\": \"Randhir Singh v. Union of India\",\n      \"identifier\": \"(1982) 1 SCC 618\",\n      \"url\": \"https:\/\/indiankanoon.org\/doc\/1230349\/\",\n      \"datePublished\": \"1982-02-22\"\n    },\n    {\n      \"@type\": \"CreativeWork\",\n      \"name\": \"Bangalore Water Supply & Sewerage Board v. A. Rajappa\",\n      \"identifier\": \"(1978) 2 SCC 213\",\n      \"url\": \"https:\/\/indiankanoon.org\/doc\/1149369\/\",\n      \"datePublished\": \"1978-02-21\"\n    },\n    {\n      \"@type\": \"CreativeWork\",\n      \"name\": \"Excel Wear v. Union of India\",\n      \"identifier\": \"(1978) 4 SCC 224\",\n      \"url\": \"https:\/\/indiankanoon.org\/doc\/947038\/\",\n      \"datePublished\": \"1978-09-29\"\n    },\n    {\n      \"@type\": \"CreativeWork\",\n      \"name\": \"Western Coal Fields Ltd. v. Manohar Govinda Fulzele\",\n      \"identifier\": \"2025 INSC 233\",\n      \"url\": \"https:\/\/indiankanoon.org\/doc\/104483191\/\",\n      \"datePublished\": \"2025-02-17\"\n    },\n    {\n      \"@type\": \"CreativeWork\",\n      \"name\": \"Indian Federation of App-based Transport Workers (IFAT) v. Union of India\",\n      \"identifier\": \"Writ Petition (Civil), Supreme Court Diary No. 22576 of 2021 (pending)\",\n      \"url\": \"https:\/\/www.scobserver.in\/cases\/gig-workers-access-to-social-security-the-indian-federation-of-app-based-transport-workers-ifat-v-union-of-india\/\"\n    }\n  ]\n}\n<\/script>\n\n\n\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\">\n{\n  \"@context\": \"https:\/\/schema.org\",\n  \"@type\": \"FAQPage\",\n  \"mainEntity\": [\n    {\n      \"@type\": \"Question\",\n      \"name\": \"What are the four new labour codes in India?\",\n      \"acceptedAnswer\": {\n        \"@type\": \"Answer\",\n        \"text\": \"The four codes are the Code on Wages, 2019, the Industrial Relations Code, 2020, the Code on Social Security, 2020, and the Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions Code, 2020. Together they replace 29 older central labour laws.\"\n      }\n    },\n    {\n      \"@type\": \"Question\",\n      \"name\": \"When did the new labour codes come into force?\",\n      \"acceptedAnswer\": {\n        \"@type\": \"Answer\",\n        \"text\": \"All four labour codes came into force on 21 November 2025, repealing 29 legacy central statutes the same day. The final Central Rules that operationalise them were notified on 8 May 2026. State rules, needed for full ground-level enforcement, are still rolling out unevenly.\"\n      }\n    },\n    {\n      \"@type\": \"Question\",\n      \"name\": \"Which old labour laws do the four codes replace?\",\n      \"acceptedAnswer\": {\n        \"@type\": \"Answer\",\n        \"text\": \"The codes subsumed 29 central Acts, including the Minimum Wages Act 1948, Payment of Wages Act 1936, Industrial Disputes Act 1947, EPF Act 1952, ESI Act 1948, Payment of Gratuity Act 1972, Maternity Benefit Act 1961 and Factories Act 1948, grouping them under the four codes by subject.\"\n      }\n    },\n    {\n      \"@type\": \"Question\",\n      \"name\": \"What is the 50% wage rule and what does it mean?\",\n      \"acceptedAnswer\": {\n        \"@type\": \"Answer\",\n        \"text\": \"The 50% wage rule requires that basic pay and dearness allowance together make up at least half of total remuneration. Allowances above that ceiling are added back into the wage base used for provident fund, gratuity and other statutory calculations. It standardises how salary is structured.\"\n      }\n    },\n    {\n      \"@type\": \"Question\",\n      \"name\": \"Will my take-home salary decrease under the new labour codes?\",\n      \"acceptedAnswer\": {\n        \"@type\": \"Answer\",\n        \"text\": \"For some employees, yes: monthly take-home can dip because a larger share of pay moves into provident fund and gratuity under the 50% wage rule. Your total CTC doesn't change; the split between in-hand pay and savings does. Reported estimates suggest roughly 5 to 10% for allowance-heavy salaries.\"\n      }\n    },\n    {\n      \"@type\": \"Question\",\n      \"name\": \"Will my PF contribution increase, and by how much?\",\n      \"acceptedAnswer\": {\n        \"@type\": \"Answer\",\n        \"text\": \"If your salary was structured with allowances above the 50% ceiling, your provident fund contribution can rise, because the wage base it's calculated on increases. The exact amount depends on your existing structure. Employees whose basic-plus-DA already exceeded 50% may see little change.\"\n      }\n    },\n    {\n      \"@type\": \"Question\",\n      \"name\": \"Are gig and platform workers now covered by law?\",\n      \"acceptedAnswer\": {\n        \"@type\": \"Answer\",\n        \"text\": \"Yes. The Code on Social Security recognises gig and platform workers as a legal category for the first time and lets the government frame welfare schemes for them, funded partly by aggregators. Workers register on the e-Shram portal to access those benefits.\"\n      }\n    },\n    {\n      \"@type\": \"Question\",\n      \"name\": \"What is the 90-day rule for gig-worker social security?\",\n      \"acceptedAnswer\": {\n        \"@type\": \"Answer\",\n        \"text\": \"Under the notified Social Security (Central) Rules, 2026, a gig or platform worker qualifies with at least 90 days of work on a single aggregator, or 120 days across multiple aggregators, in the preceding financial year. A day counts if the worker earns any income from that aggregator that day.\"\n      }\n    },\n    {\n      \"@type\": \"Question\",\n      \"name\": \"How much must aggregators contribute for gig workers?\",\n      \"acceptedAnswer\": {\n        \"@type\": \"Answer\",\n        \"text\": \"Under Section 114 of the Code on Social Security, 2020 and the notified Central Rules, aggregators contribute 1 to 2% of their annual turnover toward gig-worker welfare, capped at 5% of the amount paid or payable to those workers. State rollout still affects when schemes go live.\"\n      }\n    },\n    {\n      \"@type\": \"Question\",\n      \"name\": \"Is e-Shram registration free?\",\n      \"acceptedAnswer\": {\n        \"@type\": \"Answer\",\n        \"text\": \"Yes, e-Shram registration is completely free through the official portal at eshram.gov.in. Anyone charging a fee to register you is running a scam. Registration generates a Universal Account Number that links a worker to social-security scheme benefits, so do it directly.\"\n      }\n    },\n    {\n      \"@type\": \"Question\",\n      \"name\": \"What are the new working-hour limits?\",\n      \"acceptedAnswer\": {\n        \"@type\": \"Answer\",\n        \"text\": \"The framework anchors on a standard 48-hour working week, with a daily cap of eight hours under the notified OSH Central Rules, 2026. Work beyond eight hours a day or 48 hours a week is treated as overtime and compensated at twice the ordinary wage rate, subject to a quarterly ceiling of 144 hours.\"\n      }\n    },\n    {\n      \"@type\": \"Question\",\n      \"name\": \"How is overtime calculated under the new codes?\",\n      \"acceptedAnswer\": {\n        \"@type\": \"Answer\",\n        \"text\": \"Overtime is paid at twice the ordinary wage rate under the OSH framework. A quarterly ceiling of 144 hours on total overtime also applies under the notified OSH Central Rules, 2026, so overtime cannot be stacked without limit. The double-rate principle is the consistent anchor across the codes.\"\n      }\n    },\n    {\n      \"@type\": \"Question\",\n      \"name\": \"Is a four-day work week now allowed in India?\",\n      \"acceptedAnswer\": {\n        \"@type\": \"Answer\",\n        \"text\": \"A four-day week is permitted, but it doesn't shorten your total hours. It compresses the standard weekly hours into fewer, longer working days, keeping the 48-hour weekly cap intact, and it typically needs employee consent and a guaranteed weekly rest day.\"\n      }\n    },\n    {\n      \"@type\": \"Question\",\n      \"name\": \"What changed for maternity benefit?\",\n      \"acceptedAnswer\": {\n        \"@type\": \"Answer\",\n        \"text\": \"The Code on Social Security carries forward the existing maternity protections, including 26 weeks of paid leave and associated employer duties. The consolidation preserves these entitlements rather than reducing them. Detailed eligibility and cr\u00e8che requirements sit in the maternity spoke.\"\n      }\n    },\n    {\n      \"@type\": \"Question\",\n      \"name\": \"What are the new gratuity rules in 2026?\",\n      \"acceptedAnswer\": {\n        \"@type\": \"Answer\",\n        \"text\": \"Gratuity continues as a lump sum for employees who complete the qualifying service period, calculated on the last-drawn wage base, now larger under the 50% rule. The headline change: fixed-term staff earn pro-rata gratuity after one year, not five. Forfeiture still needs due process.\"\n      }\n    },\n    {\n      \"@type\": \"Question\",\n      \"name\": \"Are fixed-term employees eligible for gratuity after one year?\",\n      \"acceptedAnswer\": {\n        \"@type\": \"Answer\",\n        \"text\": \"Yes. Under the codes, fixed-term employees become eligible for pro-rata gratuity after one year of service, a change from the five-year threshold that still applies to permanent staff. It sits alongside their new right to pay and benefit parity with permanent employees doing the same work.\"\n      }\n    },\n    {\n      \"@type\": \"Question\",\n      \"name\": \"Is an appointment letter now mandatory for every employee?\",\n      \"acceptedAnswer\": {\n        \"@type\": \"Answer\",\n        \"text\": \"Yes. The OSH Code makes appointment letters mandatory for every worker, including in the unorganised sector where written contracts were rare. This gives workers documentary proof of employment, the foundation for claiming provident fund, gratuity and other statutory rights.\"\n      }\n    },\n    {\n      \"@type\": \"Question\",\n      \"name\": \"Are the codes actually enforceable yet, or just \\\"notified\\\"?\",\n      \"acceptedAnswer\": {\n        \"@type\": \"Answer\",\n        \"text\": \"Both. The codes are in force nationally from 21 November 2025, and the Central Rules were notified on 8 May 2026. But full ground-level enforcement often depends on state rules, which are rolling out unevenly. So the codes are legally in force, while some obligations track your state.\"\n      }\n    },\n    {\n      \"@type\": \"Question\",\n      \"name\": \"What is the full-and-final settlement timeline now?\",\n      \"acceptedAnswer\": {\n        \"@type\": \"Answer\",\n        \"text\": \"Under Section 17(2) of the Code on Wages, an employee's wages must be settled in full within two working days of resignation, removal, dismissal or retrenchment. That sharply tightens the older practice, where settlements could drag on for weeks. Gratuity keeps its own separate payment timeline.\"\n      }\n    },\n    {\n      \"@type\": \"Question\",\n      \"name\": \"What are the penalties for non-compliance in 2026?\",\n      \"acceptedAnswer\": {\n        \"@type\": \"Answer\",\n        \"text\": \"The codes carry graded penalties that scale with the seriousness of the breach and whether it's repeated, from monetary fines to imprisonment for serious or repeat violations, with many offences compoundable. Confirm the specific penalty against the notified rules.\"\n      }\n    },\n    {\n      \"@type\": \"Question\",\n      \"name\": \"How many labour laws are there in India in 2026?\",\n      \"acceptedAnswer\": {\n        \"@type\": \"Answer\",\n        \"text\": \"At the central level, India's labour laws are now consolidated into four codes, which replaced the earlier patchwork of 29 separate central Acts. State laws and rules still operate alongside them, since labour is on the Concurrent List. So the clean answer is four central codes plus state rules.\"\n      }\n    }\n  ]\n}\n<\/script>\n\n\n<style>.ls-cta-br{display:none;}@media(max-width:768px){#ls-floating-cta{padding:8px 12px !important;}#ls-floating-cta .ls-wrap{flex-direction:column !important;align-items:center !important;gap:8px !important;}#ls-floating-cta a{font-size:11px !important;padding:8px 16px !important;white-space:normal !important;text-align:center !important;max-width:90vw !important;}.ls-cta-br{display:block !important;}}<\/style><div id=\"ls-floating-cta\" style=\"position:fixed;bottom:0;left:0;right:0;z-index:9999;background:#0f0f0f;border-top:3px solid #E8382D;padding:12px 20px;box-shadow:0 -4px 20px rgba(0,0,0,0.3);\"><div class=\"ls-wrap\" style=\"display:flex;align-items:center;justify-content:center;gap:24px;\"><div style=\"display:flex;align-items:center;gap:10px;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/growthx.skillarbitra.ge\/f\/14may-id-30day-lpcore1?p_source=id2_blog&#038;p_cta=id-labour-laws-in-india\" onclick=\"gtag(&#039;event&#039;,&#039;cta_click&#039;,{send_to:&#039;G-3XDT1KHB05&#039;,p_source:&#039;id2_blog&#039;,p_cta:&#039;id-labour-laws-in-india&#039;});\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" style=\"display:inline-block;background:#E8382D;color:#fff;padding:11px 20px;border-radius:7px;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;text-decoration:none;white-space:nowrap;\">Join our 30 days Independent Director Training Program just for Rs. 100 \u2192<\/a><button onclick=\"document.getElementById('ls-floating-cta').style.display='none'\" style=\"background:none;border:none;color:#555;font-size:18px;cursor:pointer;padding:4px;line-height:1;position:absolute;right:16px;\">\u2715<\/button><\/div><\/div><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The labour laws in India were consolidated into four codes that came into force on 21 November 2025: the Code on Wages, 2019, the Industrial Relations Code, 2020, the Code&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":40,"featured_media":6945,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[579],"tags":[2197,2194,2193,2198,2195,2199,2196],"class_list":["post-6944","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-labour-laws","tag-50-wage-rule","tag-code-on-wages-2019","tag-gig-workers-social-security","tag-hr-compliance","tag-new-labour-codes-2026","tag-take-home-salary","tag-working-hours-and-overtime"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lawsikho.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6944","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lawsikho.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lawsikho.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lawsikho.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/40"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lawsikho.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6944"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/lawsikho.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6944\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6953,"href":"https:\/\/lawsikho.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6944\/revisions\/6953"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lawsikho.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/6945"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lawsikho.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6944"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lawsikho.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6944"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lawsikho.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6944"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}