In this article, you will learn a step-by-step method on how to draft a well-structured partition suit using AI tools. Whether you are a seasoned lawyer or you are starting your practice, learning this skill is not only going to save your time but also impress your clients or your seniors. You will learn all the tips and tricks to automate and customize your drafts according to your preferences.
Table of Contents
Introduction
A few days back, my senior, Arjun Sharma, said, “Come to my chamber, we need to talk.”
I have been working with him and his father, a solicitor with over 50 years of experience, for more than six years. In all these years, I had never seen them so affected by a legal matter.
However, here is the thing: this time, it was not about a client matter; instead, it was a deeply personal issue involving a family dispute.
Arjun said, “You know my friend Priya S. Nair, who lost her father last year. She is now facing a property dispute with her sister, Neha.” Of course, I remember her; she and her family are practically family to them.
I could clearly see the frustration on his face.
Her father, Suresh Nair, passed away without leaving a will sometime in or about March 2023, leaving behind valuable movable and immovable properties in Mumbai.
“She is in trouble,” Arjun said, “her sister Neha is not being fair about their father’s property, she is withholding information about the estate, and moreover, denying Priya her rightful 50% share in her father’s property.”
He handed me a file containing correspondence that Priya had shared with him. It opened the file to see that it contained legal notices requesting information about the assets. Neha ignored them all.
“Neha is controlling the properties like she owns them all and refusing to discuss division,” he continued. “Priya is being treated like an outsider and deprived of her rights.”
What made it worse was the emotional toll it took on Priya, who felt excluded from her own father’s legacy, while Neha acted as if she alone controlled the estate and was entitled to her father’s estate.
That is when Sir said, “We need to file a partition suit.”
He grabbed a marker and started sketching a family tree on his whiteboard, showing the two sisters and properties across Mumbai. “Drafting this would normally take weeks,” he said.
That is when he proposed using AI to assist in legal drafting, an idea he had discussed with peers.
Sir was initially skeptical, as after decades of drafting the traditional way, he was hesitant to rely completely on AI for such a critical matter.
But given the urgency and emotional weight of helping Priya, he was open to trying.
Let me be honest, I was nervous too. AI for drafting? I had heard my friends working in other firms using it. That was a new territory for me.
“Let me show you how this works,” said Arjun. Even Sir looked intrigued as well.
What happened next amazed us all. By the end of the day, we had transformed what seemed to be a challenging task into a well-structured partition suit.
My Sir could not believe what he was seeing.
But let me also tell you that we had to tweak it and refine it a little to make it the way my senior would have drafted it.
You need to know that AI is like a junior that you need to train; it will not directly generate drafts as per your liking.
But AI helped us organise the intricate family relationships, structure the facts as per sequence, and moreover format everything according to Bombay High Court requirements.
If you are curious about how we drafted an injunction application in a civil case, a tenancy agreement, or a written statement, all with the help of AI, then you can access them through the active links attached.
Getting back to drafting the partition suit using AI.
First, let us ensure that we understand what a partition suit is.
What is a partition suit?
You know how it goes in most Indian families, right? Your grandfather owns a property, and your father and his siblings inherit the property. Suddenly, some cousins and aunts are claiming their share of the property.
We often see that properties are jointly owned for generations and passed down without clear boundaries, and most of the time, even without a formal Will. Over time, multiple heirs fight over the same property.
I have witnessed this story unfold countless times.
That is when a partition suit comes in; it ensures that each owner receives their rightful share of the property.
In our case, we observed that the father had left movable and immovable properties, but Neha, instead of dividing them fairly, decides not to give her sister her share. Frustrating, right? Here, a partition suit is a legal remedy available to divide or separate property among co-owners formally.
When co-owners cannot reach a mutual agreement on dividing the property, they can file a partition suit to seek legal assistance. It allows the court to intervene and assist in dividing the property.
Now, before we dive into the actual drafting process, let us quickly address two crucial questions: who can file it and what the limitation period is.
Who can file a partition suit, and what is the limitation period to file a partition suit?
You are now familiar with what a partition suit is; moving on.
A partition suit can be filed by any person who is a legal heir or is a co-owner of the joint property in possession and can claim their individual share through a suit for partition.
As per Article 65 of the Limitation Act, the period of limitation to file a partition suit is 12 years from the date the right to sue accrues (e.g., when the co-owner is denied their share).
Let us now understand the drafting process using AI.
How to draft a partition suit using AI?
I will guide you through each step, showing you the exact prompts to use, the logic behind each approach, and common mistakes to avoid.
I am using ChatGPT today; you can use any AI tool of your choice, such as Grok or Claude.
By the end of this article, you will learn how to create a professionally drafted partition suit, and moreover, you will understand how you can follow this process for any other legal document.
Here are some tips to keep in mind before providing prompts to your AI tool. If you know this, then drafting any legal document will be a cake walk for you.
Step 1: To set up AI for legal drafting
It is essential to set up AI to understand the legal context and requirements, as AI will not automatically know the legal formatting and Indian court requirements. You need to set a foundation first by training it.
This is the prompt that I gave:
“I need you to help me draft a partition suit for the Bombay High Court. This is a legal document with specific formatting and structural requirements for estate partition between siblings.
Key requirements for this document:
- Must follow the Indian legal pleading format for family partition suits
- Requires a specific party description format with age, occupation, and inhabitant status
- Needs proper paragraph numbering and legal citations
- Must include estate administration prayers and partition relief
- Should follow Bombay High Court conventions for inheritance disputes
I will provide you with case facts step by step, and you should draft each section, maintaining professional legal language and proper Indian court formatting.”
Are you ready to begin with the party descriptions for a sister versus sister partition case?
This is the response that ChatGPT generated:
“I’m ready to help you draft a partition suit for the Bombay High Court involving sibling inheritance rights. I understand this requires strict adherence to the Indian legal pleading format with specific technical requirements for family property disputes.
I’ll ensure each section includes:
- Proper party descriptions with age, occupation, and inhabitant status
- Sequential paragraph numbering for inheritance facts
- Appropriate legal terminology for estate partition
- Correct prayer structure for both estate administration and partition
- Bombay High Court formatting conventions for family disputes
I’m prepared to begin with the party descriptions section. Please provide me with the details of the sisters and their deceased father’s estate, and I’ll format them according to Indian legal pleading standards for partition suits.”
Here, you need to think like you are briefing a new junior lawyer about a family property dispute; you are establishing that it is about sibling inheritance rights and estate partition. Always remember not to dump all family facts at once, as this can confuse the AI, and avoid assuming that the AI knows the specific requirements for estate partition cases.
Now, coming to step 2.
Step 2: Structure the parties section
You need to ensure that the descriptions of the parties are right, as courts are particular about party descriptions.
This is the prompt that I gave:
“Let us start with the parties section. In Indian estate partition pleadings, each party must be described with specific details in a particular format.
Here are our parties:
PLAINTIFF (the person filing the suit):
Priya S Nair – 45 years old, Software Engineer, living in Mumbai at Harmony CHS Ltd, Flat No. 12, Plot No. 45, Lokhandwala Complex, Andheri (West), Mumbai-400053
DEFENDANT (the person being sued):
Neha Thomas – 42 years old, Marketing Manager, living in Mumbai at Flat No. 12, Harmony CHS Ltd, Plot No. 45, Lokhandwala Complex, Andheri West, Mumbai-400053
RELATIONSHIP: They are sisters, both daughters of Late Suresh Nair, who died intestate on 15th March 2023.
DISPUTE: Partition of their deceased father’s estate – Priya claims Neha is withholding information about assets and trying to deprive her of her 50% inheritance share.
Please format this as the opening section of a partition suit with proper legal formatting, including the court heading “IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN ITS ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION” and suit number formatting for a 2025 case.”
This is the response that was generated by ChatGPT:
“IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN ITS ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
SUIT NO. _________OF 2025
Priya S Nair
Age: 45, Occupation: Software Engineer
Of Bombay Indian Inhabitant residing at
Harmony CHS Ltd, Flat No. 12, Plot No. 45,
Lokhandwala Complex, Andheri (West),
Mumbai-400053
…. Plaintiff
V/s
Neha Thomas
Age: 42, Occupation: Marketing Manager
Of Bombay Indian Inhabitant residing at
Flat No. 12, Harmony CHS Ltd,
Plot No. 45, Lokhandwala Complex,
Andheri West, Mumbai-400053
…. Defendant
TO
THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND
OTHER PUISINE JUDGES OF THIS
HON’BLE COURT
THE HUMBLE SUIT OF THE PLAINTIFF ABOVENAMED.
MOST RESPECTFULLY SHEWETH:
The Plaintiff most respectfully states as under:-”
Here, you are providing AI with all the raw information but asking it to apply legal formatting specific to Bombay High Court estate cases, which teaches AI the distinction between facts and legal presentation. You need to remember not to give casual descriptions like “Priya, who works in tech” as courts need precise formatting, and never skip the formal court format, which is mandatory in the Bombay High Court.
Step 3: Establish the family relationship and inheritance rights
You need to ensure that you build a foundation for inheritance claims, as partition rights stem from family relationships and intestate succession. You need to establish the father’s death and the sisters’ equal inheritance rights.
This is the prompt that I gave:
“Now, let us establish the legal foundation for our partition claim. This is about sibling inheritance rights after their father’s intestate death.
FAMILY BACKGROUND:
- Plaintiff Priya and Defendant Neha are sisters, related by blood
- Their father was Suresh Nair, who worked in banking and owned various properties
- Their mother, Kavitha Nair, died on 10th September 2018
- After their mother’s death, both sisters maintained contact with their father
FATHER’S DEATH AND INHERITANCE:
- Father Suresh Nair died intestate (without a Will) on 15th March 2023
- He left behind only two daughters: Priya (Plaintiff) and Neha (Defendant)
- Under the law, both sisters are entitled to a 50% share each of their father’s estate as the father is governed by Hindu law.
- Priya got married in 2019 and lived in a separate residence
CURRENT SITUATION:
- Father had invested in numerous movable and immovable assets
- Due to strained relations, Priya doesn’t have complete details of the estate
- Both sisters are the only legal heirs to their father’s property
Please draft this as paragraphs 1-6 of the plaint, establishing the family relationship, father’s death, and the legal basis for equal inheritance rights between the sisters.”
This is the response that was generated by ChatGPT:
“1. The Plaintiff is 45 years old and is a resident of Mumbai. The Defendant is the sister of the Plaintiff and they are related by blood relation with each other.
2. The Plaintiff’s father was in banking service and owned certain immovable and movable properties in India.
3. The Plaintiff and the Defendant were in regular contact with their father and mother at their residence. However, on 10th September 2018, their mother viz. Kavitha Nair expired leaving behind Plaintiff, Defendant and her husband. Pursuant thereto, the Plaintiff got married on 22nd August 2019 with Mr. Arjun Kumar, and maintained her separate residence while keeping in touch with her father until his demise.
4. Unfortunately, on 15th March 2023, the Plaintiff’s father Late Suresh Nair (deceased) died intestate without making any Will or other testament, leaving behind him his two daughters viz. the Plaintiff and the Defendant. Hereto annexed and marked as Exhibit “A” is copy of death Certificate dated 20th March 2023 of the deceased father.
5. Therefore, the Plaintiff and the Defendant are each entitled to 50% share of their deceased father’s property, as per the law.
6. The Plaintiff’s father had over the years invested wisely in numerous movable and immovable assets, and as on date, due to strained relations with Defendant, the Plaintiff has no details of the entire estate. Hereto annexed and marked as Exhibit “B” is copy of list of few assets of the deceased, which is to the knowledge of the Plaintiff.”
So here you are not just telling a family story, you are building a case for equal inheritance rights under intestate succession law. By establishing that the father died without a Will and left only two daughters as his heirs, you are creating the legal base for a 50-50 partition. But do not present this as an emotional family dispute rather focus on legal consequences of intestate death, and never skip the intestate aspect as this determines the inheritance law that applies.
Step 4: Document the sister’s promises and subsequent breach
You need to demonstrate the attempts made to settle the matter amicably, and the defendant’s breach of promises is crucial because courts prefer to see that parties have tried to resolve disputes outside of court before resorting to litigation.
This is the prompt that I gave:
“Now we need to show that Priya tried to resolve this amicably, but Neha broke her promises and forced litigation.
ATTEMPTED AMICABLE SETTLEMENT (2023-2024):
- For over a year after their father’s death, the sisters had several meetings and phone conversations
- Neha initially agreed to divide the estate equally between them
- Neha gave assurances that she would share complete details of all movable and immovable properties
- Neha promised to provide information about any transfers or proceeds from inherited properties
- These properties explicitly belonged to their deceased father
NEHA’S BREACH OF PROMISES:
- Priya waited for the promised details as mutually agreed
- When Neha failed to provide information, Priya instructed lawyers to send a formal notice
- The notice called upon Neha to immediately share asset details for partition purposes
- Despite a legal notice, Neha did not respond or cooperate
PRIYA’S PROTECTIVE ACTIONS:
- Since Neha ignored the notice, Priya sent cease and desist notices to the relevant parties
- These notices instructed them not to act on Neha’s requests regarding properties or accounts
- Priya informed them about the estate dispute and pending litigation
Please draft this as paragraphs 7-9, showing the timeline of attempted settlement, breach of promises, and protective legal actions taken by Priya.”
This is the response that was generated by ChatGPT:
“7. Subsequently, over a period of one year from 2023-2024, there have been several meetings and verbal conversations between the Plaintiff and the Defendant either in person and over the phone wherein the Defendant had agreed to divide the estate of their deceased father equally and gave several assurances of sharing the details of the movable and immovable properties in connection to the inherited properties of the deceased and the proceeds transferred, if any within India arising thereto from such inherited properties, which explicitly belonged to the deceased father.
8. The Plaintiff waited for such details and when she did not receive the same as mutually agreed, she accordingly in order to protect her rights and interests instructed her attorneys to issue a notice to the Defendant calling upon her to immediately share details of the assets of the deceased for the purpose of partition and division of the estate between the Plaintiff and the Defendant, as per law. Hereto annexed and marked as Exhibit “C” is a copy of the Notice dated 15th January 2025 addressed by the Advocate for the Plaintiff to the Defendant.
9. Since, the Defendant did not pay any heed to the notice, the Plaintiff immediately addressed notices dated 1st February 2025 and 5th February 2025 to the relevant authorities to cease and desist from acting on the requests of the Defendant for dealing with and/or disposing of the properties and monies, since there is a dispute in connection with the estate of the deceased and the Plaintiff is in the process of filing a suit in the Court. Hereto annexed and marked as Exhibit “D” and Exhibit “E” are copies of the Notices addressed by the Advocate for the Plaintiff to the relevant authorities.”
Here you are teaching AI that partition suits should show good faith attempts made at resolution of the matter before court intervention, which demonstrates that litigation was the last resort. This would help to strengthen your case by showing reasonableness and proper legal process. Most importantly remember not to skip the timeline of attempted settlement as courts appreciate parties who try to resolve disputes amicably, and also never omit mentioning of the formal legal notices as these establish the legal basis for claiming breach and non-cooperation.
Step 5: Present Neha’s wrongful actions and threats
You need to demonstrate why court intervention is necessary, showing that Neha is actively harming Priya’s interests and violating inheritance laws.
This is the prompt that I gave:
“Now let us show why immediate court intervention is necessary by showing Neha’s wrongful conduct and threats. Keep this section concise but impactful.
NEHA’S WRONGFUL ACTIONS:
1. PLANNING TO DISPOSE OF ASSETS: Priya learned from reliable sources that Neha plans to dispose of her father’s assets
2. THREATS AND DENIAL: Neha threatened that she would not share details and that Priya had no rightful share
3. ILLEGAL EXCLUSION: Neha has illegally excluded Priya from all estate information and decisions
4. UNAUTHORIZED CONTROL: Neha has taken undue control over properties, acting against legal requirements
5. OPEN DEFIANCE: Neha shows no intention to follow legal requirements for estate distribution
PRIYA’S CONCERNS:
- Neha wants to deprive Priya of her rightful 50% share
- Priya doesn’t know what transactions Neha may have conducted
- Risk of assets being transferred or encumbered to defeat Priya’s rights
Please draft paragraphs 10-13, illustrating Neha’s pattern of wrongful conduct that necessitates court intervention. Keep paragraphs shorter than the previous version.”
This is the response that was generated by ChatGPT:
“10. The Plaintiff has learnt from reliable sources that the Defendant is planning to dispose of the assets of the deceased. The Defendant has threatened that she will not share property details and that the Plaintiff has no rightful share in the assets left by their deceased father. The Plaintiff apprehends that Defendant has taken undue control over the properties for her personal gain and has acted against legal requirements.
11. The Plaintiff states that after the death of her father, Defendant has conducted herself in an evasive manner regarding the estate details. The Plaintiff has been illegally excluded from all involvement and information regarding the said estate of the deceased and has been deprived of her share therein. The Defendant has claimed that she will not provide any details to the Plaintiff regarding the estate of the deceased.
12. The Plaintiff further states that the Defendant wants to deprive her of her rightful share of the properties both movable and immovable of the deceased.
13. The Plaintiff is neither aware of the number nor kind of transactions that could have been pursued by the Defendant, nor has consented to any such transaction with respect to any of the properties that were owned by the deceased.”
Here, you are teaching AI that partition suits are not just about claiming rights, but also about showing harm and violation of inheritance law that requires judicial intervention. Each wrongful act connects to a specific legal remedy that you would pray for later. You should not simply list grievances, but also demonstrate a pattern of deliberate exclusion and violation of legal rights. Moreover, avoid overly emotional language and instead focus on factual violations with clear legal consequences.
Step 6: Establish legal entitlement and need for court administration
You need to establish the case for why the estate needs court assistance and that the partition is essential, because this determines the scope of relief the court can grant.
This is the prompt that I gave:
“Now we need to establish Priya’s clear legal entitlement and why the estate needs court assistance. Make this section more concise than previous versions.
PRIYA’S LEGAL ENTITLEMENT:
- She is entitled to a 50% share in all properties of her deceased father
- She has the right to have the property divided and her share handed over
- If Neha has dealt with estate assets, she must compensate for losses
NEED FOR COURT ASSISTANCE:
1. Neha is liable to account on the grounds of wilful default
2. The estate must be administered under court directions
3. The court must determine the appropriate distribution method
4. Neha must disclose complete estate particulars on an affidavit
IMMEDIATE PROTECTION NEEDED:
- Neha may transfer or create third-party interests in properties
- A Court Receiver should be appointed to protect assets
- Restraint orders are needed pending final disposal
Please draft paragraphs 14-17 to establish the legal entitlement and the need for court intervention. Keep it more concise than the previous lengthy version.”
This is the response that was generated by ChatGPT:
“14. The Plaintiff submits that in the circumstances aforesaid she is entitled to have her 50% share in the properties and to have her late father’s property (movable and immovable) divided with an order handing over the Plaintiff’s share to her.
15. The Plaintiff submits that if the Defendant has already dealt with the estate of the deceased father then she is liable to compensate the estate for all losses. The Defendant is liable to account on the ground of wilful default. The Plaintiff submits that the estate of deceased must be administered under the directions of this Hon’ble Court. The Defendant is bound to disclose on Affidavit complete particulars of the deceased’s estate including all movable and immovable properties and assets.
16. The Plaintiff apprehends that to defeat her rights, the Defendant may alienate, transfer, dispose of, and/or create third party interests in the properties in the said estate. The Plaintiff submits that the Defendant ought to be restrained from so doing, pending hearing and final disposal of this Suit.
17. The Plaintiff submits that it is just and convenient that a Court Receiver be appointed as Receiver of the entire properties, as and when such details are submitted.”
Here you are teaching AI legal reasoning about when courts should intervene in estate administration versus allowing private family settlements. This establishes the legal framework for comprehensive relief, including both partition and court administration. You do not just ask for a partition, but build the case for why court supervision is necessary, given the defendant’s conduct, and never skip the aspect of wilful default, as this justifies the court’s administrative powers.
Step 7: Add jurisdiction and procedural compliance
You need to remember that it is important to establish court jurisdiction, and it is also important to meet all procedural requirements, as courts can reject your suit that does not meet these technical requirements.
This is the prompt that I gave:
“Now we need to add all the mandatory technical elements that Indian courts require for jurisdiction and procedural compliance.
JURISDICTION ELEMENTS:
- Defendant Neha resides in Mumbai
- The entire cause of action arose in Mumbai
- Properties are located in Mumbai
- Therefore Bombay High Court has jurisdiction
CAUSE OF ACTION AND LIMITATION:
- The cause of action arose when Neha failed to respond to the notice dated 15th January 2025
- The cause of action is continuing as Neha continues to withhold information
COURT FEES AND VALUATION:
- Suit is for a 50% partition of the father’s estate
- Estimated value: Rs. 2,50,00,000 (for 50% share)
- Court fees under the Maharashtra Court Fees Act: Rs. 3,00,000
- Undertaking to pay additional fees if required
OTHER PROCEDURAL ELEMENTS:
- Statement about document reliance
- Right to amend the plaint
- No other suit filed for the same cause
Please draft this as paragraphs 18-23, covering all jurisdictional and procedural compliance requirements.”
This is the response that was generated by ChatGPT:
“18. The Defendant resides in Mumbai. The entire cause of action has arisen in Mumbai. The properties in respect of which this Suit has been filed are in Mumbai. This Hon’ble Court has therefore, jurisdiction to entertain and try this Suit.
19. The cause of action for filing this suit arose on 30th January 2025, when the Defendant, despite being called upon to do so, failed and neglected to respond to the notice dated 15th January 2025 and the cause of action is continuing as on date.
20. The Plaintiff states that the Plaintiff has prayed for partition of 50% share of deceased father’s property and, therefore, the present Suit is valued at Rs. 2,50,00,000/- under the Maharashtra Court Fees Act and accordingly, court fee of Rs. 3,00,000/- is affixed herewith.
21. The Plaintiff will rely upon documents, a list whereof is attached herewith.
22. The Plaintiff reserves the right to add, amend or alter the plaint as and when required and/or ordered by the Hon’ble Court.
23. The Plaintiff has not filed any other Suit, save and except this suit in respect of the present cause of action.”
Here, you are teaching AI not just to draft the facts of the case, but also to meet every procedural requirement that courts mandate for accepting jurisdiction and processing the case. These technical elements show that lawyers are aware of and understand the procedural law, and moreover, are serious about the case. You should not mistakenly treat these as optional “formalities” as they are legal requirements that could lead to dismissal if omitted, and also do not skip the explanation of continuing cause of action, as this addresses potential limitation issues.
Step 8: Structure out the prayer section
The prayer clause is the most important part of your suit. Your prayer clause shall consist of what relief you are seeking from the court. Therefore, you need to ensure that you draft a complete prayer section, as this determines what relief the court can grant. So, remember that you do not miss anything.
This is the prompt that I gave:
“Now we draft the ‘prayer clause’, which covers both estate administration and partition relief. This is crucial because we can only get what we specifically ask for.
ESTATE ADMINISTRATION PRAYERS:
(a) Court administration of Late Suresh Nair’s estate
(b) 50% share secured and delivered to both sisters according to their rights
(c) Neha ordered to render accounts of estate management based on wilful default
(d) Neha ordered to make good all losses caused by negligence or wilful default
(e) Court to ascertain debts, liabilities, and amounts payable to each heir
PARTITION AND INVESTIGATION PRAYERS:
(f) Court to make necessary enquiries and give appropriate directions
(g) Upon Neha disclosing the property list, physical partition by metes and bounds, with 50% to each sister
(h) Alternative: if a physical partition is not possible, then sale by auction and equal distribution of proceeds
INJUNCTION PRAYERS:
(j) Permanent injunction restraining Neha from intermeddling with the estate
(k) Multiple interim reliefs, including Court Receiver appointment, disclosure orders, and restraint orders
STANDARD PRAYERS:
(l) Ad-interim reliefs
(m) Costs
(n) Any other relief the court deems fit
Please draft this as the complete prayer clause (paragraph 24) with proper legal formatting and lettering, ensuring coverage of both administration and partition relief.”
This is the response that was generated by ChatGPT:
“24. The Plaintiff, therefore, prays:
a) That the estate of the deceased, Late Suresh Nair, be administered by and under the orders and directions of this Hon’ble Court;
b) That the 50% share each of the Plaintiff and Defendant be secured, delivered and paid to both of them according to their rights and entitlements;
c) That on the basis of wilful default, the Defendant be ordered to render true and faithful accounts of their management of and dealings with the estate of the said deceased;
d) That the Defendant be ordered to make good to the Plaintiff or to the estate of the deceased, all losses caused to the Plaintiff or the said estate by reason of the negligence, wilful default or devastation caused to the said estate by the Defendant;
e) That accounts be taken of the debts and liabilities of the estate of the deceased and the amounts payable to each heir be ascertained;
f) That all necessary enquiries be made, investigations recorded and appropriate directions given and orders passed as this Hon’ble Court deems fit, proper, expedient or necessary;
g) That upon the Defendant placing on Affidavit before this Hon’ble Court a complete list of the immovable properties of the deceased, the said immovable properties be partitioned by metes and bounds by and under the orders and directions of this Hon’ble Court and 50% share be ascertained and handed over, delivered or secured to the Plaintiff and the Defendant;
h) That without prejudice and in the alternative to prayer (g) above, and in the event of such division by metes and bounds not being found possible, then in that event suitable orders be passed for the sale by public auction or private treaty of the said immovable properties and the distribution of the sale proceeds thereof between the Plaintiff and the Defendant in equal shares;
j) That the Defendant be restrained by an order of permanent injunction of this Hon’ble Court from in any manner intermeddling or interfering with or exercising control or dominion over or dealing with or disposing of any part of the estate of the deceased;
k) That pending the hearing and final disposal of this suit:-
(a) The Court Receiver, High Court, Bombay or some other fit and proper person be appointed Receiver/Administrator pendente lite of the entire estate, properties and credits of the deceased;
(b) The Court Receiver, High Court, Bombay be appointed Receiver of all the immovable property included and comprised in the estate of the deceased with all powers under Order XL Rule I of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908;
(c) The Defendant be ordered and directed to forthwith disclose on Affidavit all the assets and properties, both movable and immovable, comprised in the estate of the deceased along with full particulars thereof;
(d) That Defendant be restrained by an order and injunction of this Hon’ble Court from acting as or holding herself out to be the executor, trustee, and administrator of Estate of the deceased;
(e) That the Defendant be restrained by an order and injunction of this Hon’ble Court from in any manner intermeddling or interfering with or exercising control or dominion over or dealing with or disposing of any part of the estate of the deceased;
(l) For ad-interim reliefs in terms of prayer (k) above;
(m) Cost of the suit;
(n) For such further and other reliefs as the nature and circumstances of the case may require.”
Here you are teaching AI that it needs to include both administration and partition prayers to address the deceased’s estate. Each prayer is connected to the facts and legal submissions made earlier in the plaint. You should know that the courts will never give you relief that you do not specifically pray for. Additionally, remember that your prayer clause should be specific, not vague.
Finally, I asked ChatGPT to collate all results and share the final draft.
This is the final draft shared with me by ChatGPT.
Next, review the draft and make necessary changes to meet your requirements. It is essential to verify the information before sending it to your clients or superiors, as AI cannot replace your expertise.
Here is the final document, with manual edits done by me in red.
Was this easy to understand?
Now, you are equipped to draft any legal document using AI. So, next time, if anyone tells you to draft something, do not hesitate to take up the task. You know what to do.
Conclusion
Did you see how this process transforms what traditionally would take weeks into work that can be completed in a day?
The time saving comes from knowing exactly what and how prompts need to be given.
Let me add to it that AI does not replace legal thinking; it simply amplifies it by handling the technical execution of your legal strategy.
Now that you have understood this methodology, you can apply the same approach to draft any legal document: contracts, appeals, applications, or even opinions.
The key is always the same: establish context, build systematically, maintain precision, and review everything.
The future of legal practice is not about AI replacing lawyers; it is about lawyers using AI to do better work more efficiently.
Frequently asked questions (FAQ’s)
- How does Order XX Rule 18 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, apply to partition suits?
In partition suits, Order XX Rule 18 of the Code of Civil Procedure,1908, empowers courts to:
- Issue a preliminary decree declaring the shares of each co-owner or legal heir in the joint property.
- Direct the partition of property by metes and bounds, if feasible.
- Order the sale of property and distribution of proceeds if physical partition is not practical.
- Provide directions for estate administration, such as appointing a receiver or ordering accounts, when required.
- Do I need to train AI to draft legal documents?
Yes, AI requires an initial setup to understand legal context, court-specific formatting, and case details. The more you train the AI, the better it gets at drafting legal documents. - Can I use other AI tools to draft legal documents?
Yes, you can use any AI tool of your choice, as long as you provide clear, structured prompts tailored to legal drafting needs, as demonstrated with ChatGPT.
- What mistakes should I avoid when using AI for legal drafting?
The most common mistakes that one must avoid are as follows:
- Using vague prompts
- Overloading the AI with too much information
- Skipping to review the draft
Allow notifications
