Part 2 of our pitch deck guide for finance professionals who want to close funding rounds with analytical rigor. You will learn the final four make-or-break slides: competitive analysis, financial projections with sensitivity analysis, and funding asks that connect to investor returns. Plus, advanced delivery techniques to survive rigorous due diligence.
Table of Contents
Introduction
Welcome back!
If you have read Part 1 of this series, you already know how to build the foundation of an investor-grade pitch deck using your finance professional advantages.
The first article illustrated how to
- quantify problems rather than just describe them,
- present solutions through unit economics,
- size markets with both top-down and bottom-up validation, and
- show traction that proves scalable business fundamentals.
Now comes the critical part—the slides that often make or break funding decisions.
Quick recap of part 1: We have been building GrainKart’s pitch deck together—an 18-month-old agri-tech platform connecting farmers directly with urban buyers.
We have prepared slides 1-6:
- The Problem (quantified market inefficiencies worth ₹2.1 trillion),
- Our Solution (5% platform fee generating sustainable unit economics),
- Market Opportunity (₹30 crore obtainable market over 3 years),
- Business Model (improving from 12.5 to 4.1 transactions for breakeven),
- Traction (₹1 lakh MRR with 25% monthly growth), and
- Go-to-Market Strategy (systematic expansion to Delhi and Bengaluru with ₹3 crore funding).
What is coming in Part 2: Now we will tackle the slides where your finance background becomes even more valuable:
- competitive analysis based on business model differences,
- team presentation that demonstrates execution capability,
- financial projections with sensitivity analysis, and
- the funding ask that connects directly to returns.
These are the slides that transform interested investors into actual cheques.
Remember Rahul from our introduction?
He is now six months into his investment role and has learned something crucial: “The entrepreneurs who get funded are not necessarily the ones with the best ideas—they are the ones whose numbers tell a compelling story that we actually believe.”
That is exactly what we are going to teach you to create.
Let me show you how to complete GrainKart’s pitch deck with the advanced techniques that close deals.
Slide 7: Competitive landscape – business model analysis that matters
Most entrepreneurs make a fatal mistake on this slide—they compare features instead of business models. As a finance professional, you know that sustainable competitive advantage comes from superior unit economics, not just better products.
Note: Competitor financial data used for illustrative purposes only and may not reflect actual company metrics. This analysis is for educational demonstration of competitive assessment methodology.
SLIDE 7: COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
GrainKart’s financial model creates sustainable competitive advantages in a crowded market.
Direct competitors analysis:
BigBasket (Market Leader)
- Revenue Model: 15-25% gross margins on inventory-heavy model
- Strengths: Scale (₹2,000+ crore revenue), brand recognition, logistics network
- Weaknesses: High working capital requirements, limited farm-level transparency
- Unit Economics: High fulfilment costs, pressure on margins from price competition
DeHaat (Agri-focused)
- Revenue Model: B2B marketplace with 8-12% commission + input sales
- Strengths: Deep farmer relationships, comprehensive agri-services
- Weaknesses: Limited direct consumer access, complex revenue streams
- Unit Economics: Higher CAC due to rural acquisition, but strong farmer retention
FreshToHome (Premium positioning)
- Revenue Model: Premium pricing with 30-40% gross margins on select categories
- Strengths: Quality positioning, urban customer loyalty
- Weaknesses: Limited product range, high customer acquisition costs
- Unit Economics: Strong margins but narrow market segment
GrainKart’s Competitive Positioning:
1. Superior unit economics
- 85% gross margins vs 15-40% for competitors
- ₹150 CAC vs ₹200-300 for premium players
- 3-month payback vs 6-12 months for inventory-heavy models
2. Scalable business model
- Asset-light platform vs inventory-heavy operations
- Direct farmer relationships vs multiple middleman dependencies
- Technology-enabled transparency vs traditional supply chain opacity
3. Defensible market position
- Premium segment focus (15% of market) vs mass market competition
- QR-code traceability creates switching costs for quality-conscious customers
- Farmer loyalty through 67% higher earnings vs traditional channels
Financial comparison (annual revenue per customer):
- BigBasket: ₹8,000-12,000 (high volume, low margins)
- DeHaat: ₹15,000-20,000 (B2B focus, seasonal)
- FreshToHome: ₹25,000-30,000 (premium pricing, limited frequency)
- GrainKart: ₹11,000 (balanced volume and margins with growth trajectory)
Why this competitive analysis works
- You focused on business model differences: Instead of saying “we are better because we have QR codes,” you showed how QR codes enable premium pricing that improves unit economics.
- You quantified competitive advantages: 85% gross margins vs 15-40% for competitors is not just better—it is dramatically different economics that create sustainable moats.
- You addressed the “why now” question: Your analysis shows that while competitors chose either scale (BigBasket) or services (DeHaat), GrainKart found the profitable middle ground with premium positioning.
- You connected to investment thesis: Superior unit economics + defensible positioning = higher returns for investors.
Slide 8: Team – demonstrating execution capability through a financial lens
Investors do not fund ideas—they fund teams that can execute those ideas profitably.
You must help present your client’s team in terms of their ability to deliver on financial projections.
SLIDE 8: FOUNDING TEAM
Domain expertise combined with a proven execution track record in building scalable businesses.
Rajesh Sharma – Founder & CEO (CA, 8 years experience)
- Financial expertise: Managed ₹50 crore P&L at Hindustan Unilever’s rural distribution
- Relevant experience: Led digital payment adoption across 2,000+ rural retailers
- Execution proof: Achieved 15% cost reduction while expanding distribution by 40%
- GrainKart contribution: Financial discipline, rural market understanding, stakeholder management
Priya Patel – Co-Founder & CTO (IIT Bombay, 6 years at Flipkart)
- Technical expertise: Built logistics systems handling 100,000+ daily transactions
- Scalability experience: Managed technology infrastructure through Flipkart’s 10x growth phase
- Execution proof: Reduced system downtime from 2% to 0.1% while scaling operations
- GrainKart contribution: Scalable technology architecture, logistics optimization, platform reliability
Dr. Amit Kumar – Head of Agriculture (PhD Agricultural Economics, IIT Kharagpur)
- Domain expertise: 12 years in agricultural supply chain management
- Government experience: Managed ₹15 crore farmer welfare schemes in Odisha
- Research credentials: 25+ published papers on sustainable farming practices
- GrainKart contribution: Farmer relationship management, quality standards, and regulatory compliance
Advisory Board:
Suresh Narayanan – Former CFO, Spencer’s Retail
- Value Add: Retail operations scaling, financial controls, investor relations
- Track Record: Led Spencer’s expansion from 50 to 200+ stores with positive unit economics
Kavita Shukla – Ex-MD, Godrej Agrovet
- Value Add: Agriculture business strategy, supply chain optimization
- Track Record: ₹500 crore revenue growth at Godrej through farmer-centric initiatives
Current team gaps (Being Filled with Funding):
- Regional Operations Managers for Delhi and Bengaluru (₹25 lakhs allocated)
- Customer Success Manager for B2B clients (₹15 lakhs allocated)
- Senior Financial Analyst for investor reporting (₹12 lakhs allocated)
- Why this team slide works
- You connected experience to financial outcomes: Rajesh did not just “work at HUL”—he managed ₹50 crore P&L and achieved specific cost improvements. Investors see execution capability.
- You addressed scalability concerns: Priya’s experience scaling Flipkart’s systems from thousands to millions of transactions directly addresses investor questions about technical scalability.
- You included financial projections for team expansion: Instead of vague “we will hire more people,” you allocated specific budget amounts to specific roles with clear value propositions.
- You acknowledged gaps honestly: Showing exactly which roles you will fill with funding demonstrates thoughtful planning rather than overconfidence.
- The CFO conversation: what investors really want to know
Let me share a conversation I overheard between a VC partner and their internal finance team:
VC Partner: “The product looks interesting, but can this team actually build a ₹100 crore business?“
Investment Director: “The CEO has P&L experience, which is crucial. Most first-time founders have never managed budget accountability. The CTO has scaled infrastructure before—that is rare. The agriculture expert has government connections, which matter for regulatory issues.“
Finance Lead: “I like that they are honest about team gaps and have allocated specific budget for key hires. Shows they understand what they do not know.“
VC Partner: “Exactly. I would rather fund a team that knows its limitations and has a plan to address them.“
Your competitive advantage: You, as a finance professional, must think about team composition in terms of functional capabilities needed to achieve financial projections. This perspective will help you present your client’s teams more convincingly.
Slide 9: Financial projections – The make-or-break slide
This is where your finance background becomes your ultimate competitive advantage. Most entrepreneurs present hockey-stick projections with no supporting analysis. You must build models that investors can believe in.
SLIDE 9: FINANCIAL PROJECTIONS
Conservative growth assumptions leading to sustainable profitability with attractive returns.
Three-Year Financial Model
| Metric | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 |
| Revenue | ₹65 lakhs | ₹3.2 crores | ₹9.5 crores |
| Gross Profit | ₹55 lakhs | ₹2.7 crores | ₹8.1 crores |
| Operating Expenses | ₹85 lakhs | ₹2.1 crores | ₹5.2 crores |
| EBITDA | (₹30 lakhs) | ₹60 lakhs | ₹2.9 crores |
| Net Cash Flow | (₹45 lakhs) | ₹35 lakhs | ₹2.3 crores |
| Cumulative Funding Required | ₹3.0 crores | ₹3.0 crores | ₹3.0 crores |
Note: Net Cash Flow differs from EBITDA due to: –
- Working capital requirements (farmer advance payments): ₹10 lakhs
- Technology capital expenditure: ₹5 lakhs
- Total cash flow adjustment: ₹15 lakhs in the year
Key assumptions (conservative estimates)
Customer growth:
- Year 1: 100 → 650 customers (550 new acquisitions)
- Year 2: 650 → 2,500 customers (1,850 net additions)
- Year 3: 2,500 → 6,000 customers (3,500 net additions)
- Assumption basis: ₹150 CAC improving to ₹100, with 40-50% referral rates
Revenue per customer:
- Year 1: ₹10,000 annually (₹833 monthly)
- Year 2: ₹12,800 annually (improving AOV and frequency)
- Year 3: ₹15,800 annually (premium products + subscriptions)
- Assumption basis: AOV growth from ₹400 to ₹650, frequency from 2.3 to 3.1 orders/month
Geographic expansion:
- Year 1: Pune (mature) + Delhi/Bengaluru launch
- Year 2: Three cities at scale + Hyderabad entry
- Year 3: Four metros + Tier-1 city pilots
Sensitivity analysis
Conservative case (50% slower growth):
- Revenue Year 3: ₹4.8 crores
- EBITDA positive: Month 30 (vs Month 24 base case)
- Additional funding needed: ₹1.5 crores in Year 2
Optimistic case (50% faster growth):
- Revenue Year 3: ₹14.2 crores
- EBITDA positive: Month 18
- Excess cash generation: ₹1.8 crores for accelerated expansion
Stress test (Competitive pressure reduces commission to 3%):
- Revenue Year 3: ₹5.7 crores (40% reduction)
- Break-even: Month 36
- Additional funding requirement: ₹2.2 crores
Unit economics evolution
| Year | CAC | LTV | LTV/CAC | Payback (Months) |
| Current | ₹150 | ₹1,800 | 12.0x | 6.5 |
| Year 1 | ₹140 | ₹2,200 | 15.7x | 5.8 |
| Year 2 | ₹120 | ₹2,800 | 23.3x | 4.2 |
| Year 3 | ₹100 | ₹3,500 | 35.0x | 3.1 |
Unit Economics Improvement Drivers:
CAC reduction (₹150 → ₹100): –
- Referral program scaling: 40% → 50% referral rate (₹30 CAC reduction)
- Brand recognition in mature markets (₹15 CAC reduction)
- Marketing efficiency improvements (₹5 CAC reduction)
LTV growth (₹1,800 → ₹3,500):
- AOV increase: ₹400 → ₹650 through premium product mix (45% revenue boost)
- Frequency increase: 2.3 → 3.1 orders/month via subscription model (35% boost)
- Retention improvement: 65% → 75% through customer success programs (15% boost)
- Why these projections work
- You built from unit economics up: Revenue projections come directly from customer count × average revenue per customer, not wishful thinking about market capture.
- You included a sensitivity analysis: Investors appreciate seeing downside scenarios and stress tests—it shows you understand risks.
- You connected assumptions to current data: AOV growth from ₹400 to ₹650 is based on premium product mix data, not random targets.
- You showed margin improvement over time: Unit economics improve with scale through operational leverage and referral-driven CAC reduction.
- The critical teaching moment: Financial modeling for startups
Here is what separates finance professionals from entrepreneurs in financial projections:
Entrepreneurs often think: “If we capture just 1% of this huge market…”
Finance professionals think: “If we acquire 500 customers monthly at ₹150 CAC with 2.3 order frequency at ₹450 AOV with 5% commission…”
Your detailed model-building process:
- Start with unit economics: CAC, LTV, payback period
- Build a customer acquisition plan: How many customers per month, at what cost?
- Model revenue per customer: Frequency × AOV × commission rate
- Calculate required operating expenses: Team, technology, marketing, working capital
- Stress test key assumptions: What if growth is 50% slower? What if competition reduces pricing?
Slide 10: The ask & use of funds – connecting investment to returns
This final slide connects everything together—problem, solution, market, team, and projections—into a specific funding request with clear value creation.
SLIDE 10: FUNDING ASK & USE OF FUNDS
₹3 crores to achieve market leadership in the premium fresh produce segment across three metro cities.
The investment opportunity
Amount: ₹3 crores pre-seed funding
Equity: 20% (₹12 crore pre-money valuation)
Investment Type: Convertible note with 20% discount on Series A
Investor Rights: Board observer seat, quarterly reporting, anti-dilution protection
Valuation justification
Current valuation analysis:
- Annual Revenue Run Rate: ₹12 lakhs (₹1 lakh MRR × 12)
- Pre-money Valuation: ₹12 crores
- Revenue Multiple: 10x (premium justified by specific advantages)
Comparable company analysis:
- DeHaat: ₹1,000 crore valuation at ₹200 crore revenue (5x multiple)
- FreshToHome: ₹500 crore valuation at ₹150 crore revenue (3.3x multiple)
- GrainKart Premium Justification: –
- 85% gross margins vs competitors’ 15-40% (2x margin advantage)
- 40% referral rate, reducing future CAC by 33%
- Asset-light model enabling faster scaling
- Conservative alternative: 6-8x multiple = ₹7-10 crore pre-money valuation
Forward-looking valuation (18 months):
- Projected Year 2 Revenue: ₹3.2 crores
- Expected Series A Multiple: 6- 8x revenue
- Series A Valuation Range: ₹20-25 crores
- Investor Return: 67-108% on current investment
Detailed use of funds
1. Customer acquisition (₹90 lakhs – 30%)
- Digital marketing across Delhi, Bengaluru: ₹60 lakhs
- Partnership development and events: ₹20 lakhs
- Referral program incentives: ₹10 lakhs
- Expected Outcome: 2,400 new customers over 18 months
- Digital marketing: 1,200 customers at ₹200 CAC = ₹24 lakhs
- Referral program: 720 customers at ₹50 CAC = ₹3.6 lakhs
- Partnership channels: 480 customers at ₹100 CAC = ₹4.8 lakhs
- Blended CAC: ₹375 (₹90 lakhs ÷ 2,400 customers)
2. Technology development (₹80 lakhs – 27%)
- Mobile app enhancement and web platform: ₹35 lakhs
- Logistics integration and route optimization: ₹25 lakhs
- AI-powered demand forecasting: ₹20 lakhs
- Expected Outcome: 40% improvement in operational efficiency
3. Team expansion (₹75 lakhs – 25%)
- Regional managers (Delhi, Bengaluru): ₹40 lakhs
- Customer success and farmer relations: ₹25 lakhs
- Finance and operations support: ₹10 lakhs
- Expected Outcome: Infrastructure for 10x scale operations
4. Working capital (₹45 lakhs – 15%)
- Farmer advance payments during harvest: ₹25 lakhs
- Inventory buffers for demand spikes: ₹15 lakhs
- Payment gateway security deposits: ₹5 lakhs
- Expected Outcome: Smooth operations during scaling
5. Contingency & legal (₹10 lakhs – 3%)
- Regulatory compliance and food safety: ₹6 lakhs
- Legal documentation and IP protection: ₹4 lakhs
Milestone-based fund release
Tranche 1 (₹1.5 crores – Month 1):
- Team hiring complete
- Delhi market launch
- 200 new customer acquisitions
Tranche 2 (₹1 crore – Month 6):
- Bengaluru market launch
- ₹3 lakh monthly revenue across all cities
- Technology platform upgrade complete
Tranche 3 (₹50 lakhs – Month 12):
- 1,500 total active customers
- Positive unit contribution in all markets
- Series A preparation initiated
Expected returns & exit strategy
Investor return scenarios:
Conservative (3x multiple on exit):
- Series A valuation: ₹18 crores
- Current investor stake value: ₹3.6 crores
- ROI: 80% over 18 months
Base case (5x multiple on exit):
- Series A valuation: ₹30 crores
- Current investor stake value: ₹6 crores
- ROI: 200% over 18 months
Optimistic (8x multiple on exit):
- Series A valuation: ₹48 crores
- Current investor stake value: ₹9.6 crores
- ROI: 420% over 18 months
Exit Timeline: 4-5 years through strategic acquisition by:
- Large retail chains (BigBasket, Grofers)
- Agriculture conglomerates (ITC, Godrej Agrovet)
- International players entering the Indian market
- Why this funding ask works
- You connected funding to specific outcomes: ₹90 lakhs customer acquisition = 2,400 customers at ₹375 blended CAC, leading to ₹8 lakh monthly revenue.
- You provided multiple validation points: Milestone-based releases ensure investors can track progress against projections.
- You justified valuation with comparables: 10x revenue multiple is a premium but supported by superior unit economics and growth trajectory.
- You showed multiple return scenarios: Conservative to optimistic cases give investors confidence in downside protection and upside potential.
Design & delivery excellence
Your pitch deck content is now investor-grade, but presentation matters enormously. Here is how to deliver with the professionalism investors expect from finance backgrounds.
- Visual design principles
Keep it clean and professional: Your finance background already commands respect—do not distract with fancy animations or complicated graphics.
Use consistent formatting:
- Font: Arial or Calibri (professional, readable)
- Colorus: Maximum two colours (navy/blue + one accent)
- Layout: Consistent margins and spacing across all slides
Data visualization best practices:
- Charts should support your narrative, not replace it
- Always include data sources and time periods
- Use simple bar charts and line graphs over complex visualizations
The 10-second rule: Each slide should communicate its core message within 10 seconds of viewing.
- Delivery techniques
Lead with numbers, support with story: Start each slide with the key metric or financial insight, then explain the context.
Use transitional phrases that show analytical thinking:
- “Based on our cohort analysis…”
- “The sensitivity analysis shows…”
- “Cross-referencing with industry benchmarks…”
- “Our unit economics model indicates…”
Address questions with prepared data: Always have backup slides with detailed calculations, assumption justifications, and additional scenarios.
- Common presentation mistakes
Mistake 1: Too much detail in main slides
- Wrong: Showing full P&L with 20 line items
- Right: Key metrics summary with detailed backup in the appendix
Mistake 2: Apologizing for conservative assumptions
- Wrong: “These numbers might seem low, but…”
- Right: “Our conservative assumptions ensure achievable targets with upside potential.”
Mistake 3: Getting lost in technical explanations
- Wrong: 5-minute explanation of revenue recognition methods
- Right: Clear statement of business model with brief methodology note
Anticipating investor questions
Your analytical background helps you anticipate the detailed questions investors will ask. Here are the critical ones for GrainKart:
- Financial model questions
“Walk me through your customer lifetime value calculation.”
Your prepared answer: “LTV equals average monthly revenue per customer times gross margin percentage times average customer lifespan. For Year 3: ₹1,317 monthly revenue × 85% margin × 36 months retention = ₹40,344 LTV. However, for our unit economics table, we use a more conservative discounted LTV of ₹3,500 that accounts for customer churn risk and time value of money over a 24-month period.”
“What happens if commission rates compress due to competition?”
Your prepared answer: “We have stress-tested scenarios down to 3% commission. At 3%, our Year 3 revenue drops to ₹5.7 crores, but we remain EBITDA positive by Month 36. We would need additional ₹2.2 crore funding, but ROI still exceeds 150% for early investors.”
“How do you defend against BigBasket entering your premium segment?”
Your prepared answer: “BigBasket’s inventory-heavy model creates 12-15% fulfillment costs vs our 3-5%. To match our farmer payouts while maintaining their margins, they would need to charge consumers 25-30% more than current market rates. Our QR-code traceability and farmer relationships create switching costs they cannot replicate easily.”
- Operational questions
“What happens during monsoon season or supply disruptions?”
Your prepared answer: “We have built 15% working capital buffer specifically for seasonal variations. Our diversified farmer network across 12 villages reduces weather risk. Additionally, our platform fee model means we are not holding inventory—supply disruptions affect GMV but do not create write-offs.”
“How do you ensure food safety and quality control?”
Your prepared answer: “Dr. Kumar leads our quality program with FSSAI compliance protocols. Every farmer undergoes quality training, and we maintain temperature-controlled logistics partnerships. Our insurance covers ₹50 lakh liability, and QR-code traceability enables rapid response to any issues.”
- Strategic questions
“Why won’t farmers go direct to consumers and cut you out?”
Your prepared answer: “Farmers value our customer aggregation, logistics coordination, and payment security. Individual farmers cannot achieve the marketing reach or operational efficiency we provide. Our 40% referral rate shows customers prefer our curated marketplace over fragmented direct buying.”
“What is your international expansion strategy?”
Your prepared answer: “We are focused on India for the next 3-5 years—the market opportunity here exceeds ₹30 crores just in premium segments. International expansion would require different regulatory approaches and local partnerships. We see more value in becoming the market leader in Indian metros first.”
Advanced investor psychology for finance professionals
Understanding how investors think gives you a significant advantage in both creating and delivering your pitch.
- What investors really evaluate
Beyond the numbers: While investors scrutinize your financials, they are ultimately evaluating three things:
- Market timing: Is this the right solution at the right time?
- Execution capability: Can this team actually build what they are projecting?
- Return potential: Will this generate the 10x returns my fund requires?
The unspoken questions: Every investor is thinking:
- “What could go wrong with this model?”
- “How will this company defend against competition?”
- “Can I explain this investment to my partners convincingly?”
- “Does the valuation leave room for future growth?”
- Psychological techniques that work
- Acknowledge risks before investors raise them: “The main risk we see is commission compression from competition. We have stress-tested down to 3% commission and remain profitable with a modified growth timeline.”
- Use specific, credible numbers: “73% willingness to pay premium” (from your survey) is more believable than “most customers want quality.”
- Show incremental progress: “We have reduced CAC from ₹200 to ₹150 over 6 months” proves you can improve metrics systematically.
- Connect to familiar success stories: “Like Flipkart did for e-commerce, we are bringing transparency to agriculture commerce.”
- Advanced framework: The CFO test
Before finalizing any pitch deck, apply the “CFO Test”—would a seasoned CFO believe these projections and invest their company’s money?
Financial Credibility Criteria:
- Unit Economics Math: Do CAC, LTV, and payback calculations work mathematically?
- Market Assumptions: Are penetration rates realistic given customer acquisition capacity?
- Operational Scaling: Do expense projections account for infrastructure requirements?
- Working Capital: Is cash flow timing realistic for the business model?
- Competitive Response: How do projections hold up under competitive pressure?
Red flags that fail the CFO Test:
- Revenue projections not tied to specific customer acquisition plans
- Unit economics that improve dramatically without clear operational drivers
- Market penetration assumptions requiring unrealistic marketing efficiency
- Cost structures that do not scale with projected revenue growth
- Working capital requirements are not aligned with a business model
Conclusion:
Over these two articles, I have tried to teach you how to create pitch decks that leverage your unique analytical background. I am sure that you now understand how to quantify problems, validate solutions through unit economics, size markets with bottom-up analysis, and present financial projections that survive investor scrutiny.
- What makes you different?
- You build credibility through rigor: While entrepreneurs rely on passion and vision, you support every claim with data that investors can verify and believe.
- You anticipate investor questions: Your due diligence training helps you address concerns before they are raised, creating smoother funding conversations.
- You understand investor psychology: You know that investors are not buying products—they are buying financial returns. Your presentations naturally focus on ROI, scalability, and exit potential.
- You connect strategy to numbers: Every strategic decision in your pitch deck has clear financial implications that you can quantify and defend.
- The market reality: why this matters now
The startup ecosystem is becoming increasingly sophisticated. Gone are the days when great ideas alone could secure funding. Today’s investors demand:
- Realistic financial projections based on proven unit economics
- Clear paths to profitability with defensible competitive advantages
- Evidence-based market analysis that survives due diligence
- Teams capable of execution with track records of financial discipline
Your finance background positions you perfectly for this evolution. While others struggle to make their numbers believable, you instinctively understand what investors need to see.
- Action items: start applying these skills
1. Immediate actions:
- Find a startup to analyse: Use a company you know (client, portfolio investment, or case study) and build their pitch deck using this framework
- Practice the CFO test: Review 3-5 actual startup pitch decks and identify which financial claims you would question as an investor
- Build your template: Create a pitch deck template based on our framework that you can customize for different opportunities
2. Medium-term development:
- Seek pitch deck opportunities: Offer to help entrepreneurs in your network improve their fundraising presentations
- Join investor networks: Attend angel investor meetups to see pitch presentations and understand investor perspectives
- Consider startup advisory roles: Use your pitch deck skills to add value to early-stage companies as a formal advisor
3. Long-term career strategy:
- Build a reputation: Become known in your network as the finance professional who understands startup fundraising
- Develop a consulting practice: Help companies prepare for fundraising rounds, M&A processes, or board presentations
- Consider investment roles: Your ability to evaluate and improve pitch decks makes you valuable to VC firms, corporate venture arms, or family offices
A final word:
Creating investor-grade pitch decks gives you something invaluable: the confidence that comes from true competence. When you know you can take any business idea and transform it into a compelling, financially sound investment opportunity, you become the kind of professional that entrepreneurs seek out and investors trust.
Remember GrainKart’s journey from our introduction—₹1 lakh MRR with early metrics that needed improvement. Through systematic analysis, realistic projections, and professional presentation, we transformed those raw numbers into a compelling ₹3 crore investment opportunity.
That transformation did not happen through marketing magic or presentation tricks. It happened through the disciplined application of financial analysis, market validation, and strategic thinking—exactly the skills that make you valuable as a finance professional.
Whether you are evaluating the next unicorn, building your own venture, or helping clients navigate the startup ecosystem, you now have the framework to create presentations that actually get funded.
The startup world needs more finance professionals who understand both the numbers and the narrative. You are now equipped to be exactly that professional.
Ready to put these skills to work? The startup ecosystem is waiting for someone who can finally make the numbers add up.
Allow notifications
